Originally Posted by Detoxing:
Maybe you don't understand how percentages work?
Do you understand how probability works?
With the average NFL career being only three years, teams with more picks four or five years ago are more likely to have a higher percentage of players who are out of the league than teams who had fewer picks four or five years ago. Especially if the bulk of those picks are in the later rounds. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Do you understand how probability works?
With the average NFL career being only three years, teams with more picks four or five years ago are more likely to have a higher percentage of players who are out of the league than teams who had fewer picks four or five years ago. Especially if the bulk of those picks are in the later rounds.
You never answered the question as to if you ate paint chips as a child. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Do you understand how probability works?
With the average NFL career being only three years, teams with more picks four or five years ago are more likely to have a higher percentage of players who are out of the league than teams who had fewer picks four or five years ago. Especially if the bulk of those picks are in the later rounds.
That might be the average career for a player drafted by Pay a Ton or Failway, but not King Veach.
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Do you understand how probability works?
With the average NFL career being only three years, teams with more picks four or five years ago are more likely to have a higher percentage of players who are out of the league than teams who had fewer picks four or five years ago. Especially if the bulk of those picks are in the later rounds.
You said so yourself. You had six more draft picks than us in those years.
6. Not 60. Just 6.
And that's going to account for the percentage difference?
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
You said so yourself. You had six more draft picks than us in those years.
6. Not 60. Just 6.
And that's going to account for the percentage difference?
Uh-huh. Riiiiiiiight.
I said it would "partly" explain it. We knew the 2017 draft was awful after year 1. If Bolles didn't come along it would've been an even bigger disaster. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Again, positional value. Hitting on a good guard, center and run defending ILB isn't the same thing as hitting on a good corner or pass rusher.
The rest of Veach's drafts have been absolute shit, and you know it.
Pretty good positional value to get a beast ILB running the defense :-)
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
I said it would "partly" explain it. We knew the 2017 draft was awful after year 1. If Bolles didn't come along it would've been an even bigger disaster.
And, as you point out every three posts, KC's 2018 draft wasn't very good.
Veach still dragging his nuts all over your FO! [Reply]
I love the "positional value" argument. So desperate.
Value is relative. To the Chiefs last offseason, no acquisitions were more important than OL. Veach knocked it out of the park. Upgrading the LB position was also a huge priority.
Thank God we're not trying to defend a guy whose claim to fame is finding a solid corner with pick #9. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
You never answered the question as to if you ate paint chips as a child.
Why would you think he stopped doing this after he was a child? From his posts, I strongly suspect that this is an ongoing behavioral issue. In fact, if that could be confirmed, it would explain so much. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Are we at the point yet...where Donktards start to realize their FO just paid $250 million for a QB that was worse than Bridgewater last season?
If not..when do they finally realize they were just sold a hype-lemon...week 5-6?
Too ****ing funny....Wilson also doesn't have Patrick or Fant (60% of the 2021 TD production from their skill positions)
Unlike the Keesum, Flacco and Bridgewater experiments...Moobs is yours for 5 years. There is no "moving on".
It's funny that Donk fans were saying they were just happy to finally get competent QB play....yet Bridgewater actually performed better.
Worse than Bridgewater? How? Wilson was better than Bridgewater in every stat last season, which should surprise no one who actually watched any football.
Edit: The image didn't load for me at first, I should have guessed it was PFF. Hilarious. [Reply]
Number dont lie...you just got yourself the 18th best QB from last season.
Mr. 18th...unlimited indeed!!
Seahawks fans...that watched him every week...said he was declining...maybe you should have listened to them instead of puff media. You'll have 5 years to decide for yourself...really dont have a choice. [Reply]
