It's true though. Predictably. :-)
His coaches were total ass in Denver.
[Reply]

Seems par for the course.
[Reply]

Oh, he sucks, but it’s not hard to envision him winning more games with a competent organization.
[Reply]

Funyun's treatment of Lock was heartwarming, for his AFC West foes
[Reply]

Not sure I follow. Here are the recent QB records since leaving Denver:

Siemian: 0-5
Flacco: 0-5
Keenum: 3-7

In what world is a QB improving after leaving Denver “par for the course”?

You know he went to the Seahawks, right?
[Reply]

You don't follow because you don't want to. You do know that Seattle has much better coaches and Wr's, right?
BTW, how did Teddy Bridgewater, Keesum and Flacco do before they went to Denver? See what I did there? It works both ways.

Also, I never said anything about par for the course. All I said was he has a better shot in Seattle because he had no shot in Denver with that ASS coaching staff. And anyone with half a brain can see that. Which might be why you're having issues with it. :-)
[Reply]

You should go convince a Seahawks fan about how good Carroll is.
[Reply]

:-)

https://kkam.com/texas-tech-double-f...er-trick-play/


[Reply]

Bet even Seattle fan would agree that he is MUCH BETTER than Fangio...You're probably literally the only one on the planet who might not think so.
[Reply]

How the fuck is a flea flicker "unthinkable"?
[Reply]

Did I say anything defending Fangio? I only think Lock sucks.
[Reply]

He does. But I bet you anything if he starts for Seattle, he will be better than he was in Denver. Denver had a terrible HC and staff. Seattle has better coaches than Denver had (Anyone does, maybe even Detroit) and also has better Wr's. At least he'll have a chance not to suck as bad.
[Reply]

No argument here. I’ll just say that “not suck as bad” is not what I want for my QB.
[Reply]

Yep. A well-coached team that consistently goes to the playoffs (and fleeces people in trades).
[Reply]

Lock showing mote already than he ever did in pile high. Uh oh...
[Reply]