Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
KJ has been behind Sutton, Patrick and Jeudy his entire career, add-in an ACL and one of the worst QB situations in the league, and you get underwhelming numbers like that.
KJ can play, though, and if teams don't respect him early in the season expect KJ and Russ to crush them with backbreaking big plays.
So this turd, was backed up behind some bigger turds so he hasn’t had a chance to stink up the bowl yet?? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
KJ has been behind Sutton, Patrick and Jeudy his entire career, add-in an ACL and one of the worst QB situations in the league, and you get underwhelming numbers like that.
KJ can play, though, and if teams don't respect him early in the season expect KJ and Russ to crush them with backbreaking big plays.
Originally Posted by GROB:
Fant was a nice player but under achiever. He struggled to even linenup correctly many times. Could it be the QB? Maybe but that requires you to stay healthy which he has not.
Lock is not the answer at QB. Never improved after college despite showing flashes here and there but his bad plays happen way to often and sucks throwing deep.
Harris was a good player and decent starter. Totally replaceable though.
None of those players were going to see another contract. Yes pretty much throw away into the deal players.
I don't think I could find a single person who would agree that "throwaway" is synonymous with "good," but all righty.
You could say that any player who isn't elite is replaceable. I guarantee you weren't calling Fant a throwaway before the deal. If you were, you were the only Denver fan to do so. There were even homers saying that he was in Kelce's ballpark. :-)
I've seen some Denver fans admit that you have questions on the DL, so I'm sure you could still use a player like Harris. And frankly, even Lock is a pretty big loss, because your backup is now a guy with 1 career start and 5 turnovers. Ouch.
The bottom line is that you gave up a bunch of premium picks, two solid starters, and your backup QB to acquire a past-his-prime QB who is going to expect 50 mil/year. Not exactly the ideal way to close the gap with a team that was already far better than you and has a lot of draft capital. Not to mention the rest of the division. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
KJ has been behind Sutton, Patrick and Jeudy his entire career, add-in an ACL and one of the worst QB situations in the league, and you get underwhelming numbers like that.
KJ can play, though, and if teams don't respect him early in the season expect KJ and Russ to crush them with backbreaking big plays.
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
I would have been more afraid of Denver with Matt Ryan over Russ.
I think he's more likely to be a better QB. Won't annoy teammates and cause locker room rifts. And Denver would have kept a lot more of their draft picks.
Oof. I used to respect your football takes. [Reply]
Originally Posted by GROB:
When have I said my team is better? When have I talked negative about KC? I'm pointing out flaws in your guys arguments. I can't imagine spending as much time as many do on here and still not know a whole lot about the game. You would have to accidently learn something but a lot of guys don't on here. Most can't even put together any thought for an argument just go to strawman arguments with stats and pictures from not credible sources.
Whatever man, you do you boo. Some people just require attention and constantly scream look at me...we call them clowns.
Matt Ryan is a winner in life and a complete loser in sports. His claim to fame is winning an NFC championship. Getting that loser Tony Gonzalez, a playoff win and losing the super bowl being up by 22 points. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
Matt Ryan is a winner in life and a complete loser in sports. His claim to fame is winning an NFC championship. Getting that loser Tony Gonzalez, a playoff win and losing the super bowl being up by 22 points.
That complete loser in sports is going to have a better season than lil' doughnut-eater in Denver [Reply]
