This thread seems to be going well
[Reply]

I've heard people call Florio out whenever he references law, saying he hasn't practiced it in quite awhile and isn't up to snuff on some of the things he's preaching.
[Reply]

You should strive to be better than 88, no matter what Dunning Kruger has to say about it.
[Reply]

Completely irrelevant to the thread or to my response to you but congratulations, you got a word in Reddit Mad Libs.

AI bot could do what you just did with minimal effort.
[Reply]

Maybe. We'll see.

But I think most of us kind of thought this wouldn't go to trial; that it would be pled down and that ultimately it would be negotiated between Rice's lawyer the prosecutors and the judge. And maybe that still happens somehow.

But if it goes to trial. In Dallas. In front of a jury of Dallas jurors, and the prosecution decides to really be aggressive about sticking Rice with something, well, I don't think that jury is going to be as lenient, that's all.
[Reply]

Well, I could have spent paragraphs explaining how far off reality "making things harder than they had to be" was last year and how much further off it is this year, but you've never seemed receptive to debate.... just mashing your keyboard telling people your reality as you see it over and over.

So, we're left with laughing at you while you and 88 are left with calling intelligent people retards over and over. That's literally all you two do, post dumb stuff from Twitter and then call people retards.

I personally think you're at least slightly better than that, but I guess that's for you to prove right (as I said, you should strive for better).

Yet, if you can't objectively say someone such as WTI is one of the more/most intelligent people here, regardless of how much or little you agree with what he says... then that's of course where DK comes in.

Be smarter or do better.... or don't, I guess. :-)
[Reply]

Like masterbating with a cheese grater
[Reply]

I don't think winning with a top three defense is a sustainable strategy. I don't like making Mahomes play hero ball with crappy WR's and an aging Kelce is ideal.

But it's not like anybody promised us a three peat.
[Reply]

You don't even understand the findings of DK and how they apply IRL. You are using the word and concept incorrectly.


I would ask you to be smarter but that would require you to actually understand the concept you are promoting.
[Reply]

I have stated there are different ways to win.

You can with with a defensive build, a balanced build, or an offensive build.

I think Veach has been leaning to a defensive/balanced concept but has hit on so many more defensive players that the results are a a defensive build.

Would love to see an offense focused draft.
[Reply]

All that emotion. Settle down, Queen. Try some Mother's Little Helper to take the edge off.

12/28/23

Yea, the thread was all about making it harder on themselves. Face it, chica, you laid face down, ass up in that thread.
[Reply]

So you are an old man yelling at the clouds and you are mad at me because another poster said something one time?


Cool cool.


Originally Posted by Hazel

their QB has a cap hit of $57 million next year

Have no idea what point you are trying to make here. This isn't me.
[Reply]

This really has become boy band, teen age discussion.
[Reply]

Surejan.gif

Don't change the subject. (although it's what women do and betas with pronouns, but just try not to do that).

And some of us, the rational, logical thinkers, said, sit tight. They'll hit their stride when it counts. But you and you're shriveled up thyroid couldn't listen to the men. Instead you screeched.
[Reply]

YOU changed the subject first.


So if that hurts your feelings then it's on you.

As I said, try responding to the posts in the thread next time rather than random words that hurt your feelings months ago. Your response to my post was nonsensical gibberish.
[Reply]