ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 3 of 3
< 123
Nzoner's Game Room>Sam Darnold to Seattle
FloridaMan88 12:34 PM Yesterday
Just heard on NFL Radio.

Three years, $110.5 million, $55 million guaranteed.
[Reply]
Easy 6 05:56 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Darnold is a flash in the pan.

He won't do anything near that again.

Ryan had a long stretch of just below elite play. Years of it.
Maybe he is, maybe he isn't

He just keeps sticking around and showing signs of improvement

His ceiling is Matt Ryan, and he can reach it on the right team IMO
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 06:06 PM Yesterday
Nah, he's right. The career year that Darnold just had is slightly better than Matt Ryan's career averages. Ryan averaged 4562 yards and a 28/13 career TD/INT ratio, Darnold got 4319 and 35/12 in by far his best season ever
[Reply]
Ron Mexico 07:20 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch:
Nah, he's right. The career year that Darnold just had is slightly better than Matt Ryan's career averages. Ryan averaged 4562 yards and a 28/13 career TD/INT ratio, Darnold got 4319 and 35/12 in by far his best season ever
Wow, that's hard to believe. Darnild really was basically left for dead post NYJ
[Reply]
Easy 6 08:01 PM Yesterday
Seriously man, before Mahomes we would've been BEGGING for a Darnold

Just some elementary display of basic competence would've been all it took to send us all wild, it was once that bad here

Rebuilding Seattle did well to claim this guy IMO
[Reply]
BWillie 08:15 PM Yesterday
Darnold was helped IMMENSELY by the Vikings system and talent.

He won't be near as effective in Seattle. Maybe a 87 QB rating guy.
[Reply]
Bump 08:17 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Darnold was helped IMMENSELY by the Vikings system and talent.

He won't be near as effective in Seattle. Maybe a 87 QB rating guy.
true and does Seattle even have any WR's that are good still?

There's no shot that he replicates what he did with the Vikings.
[Reply]
warpaint* 06:24 AM Today
So why didn’t the Raiders just sign Darnold and save their 3r pick? I know it takes two to tango but I really don’t u/s that move for a very limited player. Seahawks get a 3r pick and sign a younger comparable player. Neither are winning anything but the latter seems obviously smarter.
[Reply]
chiefzilla1501 06:29 AM Today
Originally Posted by warpaint*:
So why didn’t the Raiders just sign Darnold and save their 3r pick? I know it takes two to tango but I really don’t u/s that move for a very limited player. Seahawks get a 3r pick and sign a younger comparable player. Neither are winning anything but the latter seems obviously smarter.
I mean, neither are contenders with these QBs. But I think darnold needs to be dialed back into a scripted game manager. And geno needs to gun sling. So I think they both ended up in the place that suits them better.
[Reply]
kccrow 06:30 AM Today
Originally Posted by Bump:
true and does Seattle even have any WR's that are good still?

There's no shot that he replicates what he did with the Vikings.
Jaxon Smith-Njigba is damned good.

You'd have to think hey'll focus on getting a couple of WRs in FA and the draft. They really don't have too many other pure holes in their roster, mostly just need fo focus on trying to improve some areas.
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 06:31 AM Today
Originally Posted by warpaint*:
So why didn’t the Raiders just sign Darnold and save their 3r pick? I know it takes two to tango but I really don’t u/s that move for a very limited player. Seahawks get a 3r pick and sign a younger comparable player. Neither are winning anything but the latter seems obviously smarter.
Pete Carroll wanted Geno in particular is my assumption.
[Reply]
chiefzilla1501 06:33 AM Today
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Darnold was helped IMMENSELY by the Vikings system and talent.

He won't be near as effective in Seattle. Maybe a 87 QB rating guy.
Well yeah but he’s not gonna get a team like that. But in Minnesota you’re absolutely nuts if you’re not feeding your WRs constantly. In Seattle darnold can sit back and let the RBs run the show. Seattle doesn’t have to put darnold front and center
[Reply]
TLO 08:12 AM Today
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501:
Well yeah but he’s not gonna get a team like that. But in Minnesota you’re absolutely nuts if you’re not feeding your WRs constantly. In Seattle darnold can sit back and let the RBs run the show. Seattle doesn’t have to put darnold front and center
And their ceiling is probably an NFC Division game.

Welcome to hell.
[Reply]
scho63 09:57 AM Today
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
He's Matt Ryan reborn, with a decent cast around him he can win you ten or so games year in and out
Don't agree with this ....:-)
[Reply]
chiefzilla1501 10:02 AM Today
What I don’t get is why Seattle doesn’t recognize the moves that got them Russell Wilson. They traded valuable picks for Charlie whitehurst. Even still they gave Matt Flynn a mega contract. And yet they still drafted Russell relatively early and had the balls to start him even after all they sunk on Flynn/whitehurst

For that matter I still do not understand why franchises settle for middling QBs. Signing darnold isn’t the worst move if you commit to a relentless search for a young qb to take his place.
[Reply]
Page 3 of 3
< 123
Up