That horrendous call last year against the raiders really hurt his chances for DPOY. He should have had 16.5 sacks. But also a forced fumble, a fumble recovery, and very possibly a defensive TD return. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
Next to zero, which is why I’m on the tag and trade bandwagon.
I love the guy, but I’m right there with you.
Using all this dumb contract year logic, then he'll have another contract year in 2025 with the deal he wanted. He might not have 15 at that time, but 10+ is very likely if he's supposedly only motivated to play hard on contract years (which is a fabrication btw). [Reply]
Chris is playing for his next monster contract. Every snap matters. He'll get it, then wave farewell as he leaves to finish his career for a team without a franchise QB. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chiefaholic:
Chris is playing for his next monster contract. Every snap matters. He'll get it, then wave farewell as he leaves to finish his career for a team without a franchise QB.
Yep. I think this is where it's all headed as well. [Reply]