Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Romo wasn’t wrong, though. They were bullying us in the trenches and that was extremely surprising.
I think we were all a bit worried.
Bigger annoyance for me was Nantz. He had absolutely no razzle dazzle in his voice calling big plays for KC yet I thought he might jizz anytime Buffalo made a hot play.
And he whined about the first down by PI call. [Reply]
Originally Posted by cabletech94:
oh wow! i remember in the Pats/KC championship he was doing a great job of call predictions!! you know what, he DOES NOT do that anymore. he was most def more enjoyable then.
He was my favorite broadcaster for that reason. It's amazing how quick he fell off. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJJasonp:
And he whined about the first down by PI call.
BRO, Nantz was crying SO much. There were a couple times where our guys brought the ball carrier down in a scrum like .6 seconds after the whistle and he’s all “WHOA WHOOAAA, IS THAT A LITTLE EXCESSIVE THERE OR WHAT, GENE?!?”. Like, dude, shut.the.fuck.up!
I did enjoy Gene coming in each time and shutting him down immediately. [Reply]
Collinsworth has some terrible sound bytes from today.
When you have 215 pounds of man coming across the middle, he's just not strong enough to get the ball out of the strong hands of Mike Evans. Thirsty Cris?
Now you've got an all pro lineman going down on your corner back.
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
The guy needs to go. I don't know how CBS can keep this asshole around.
He doesn't analyze shit. ****, at least Collinsworth talks about actual football plays when he does the game.
Romo has been reduced to just screeching like a girl and saying dumb cliche bullshit.
MAYBE THIS IS THE YEAR ALLEN GETS HIS SUPER BOWL
Maybe it's not, Tony. Either way, maybe you should calm the **** down and just describe what it is you're actually seeing instead of speculating over who just "wants it more"
I’ll get some hate, but I’ll say it just to be transparent. A lot of posters here made me become fond of Tony’s commentary in his first few years because he really broke down the game. I don’t see his commentary as being biased against the chiefs tbh, I see him as playing devils advocate and it’s easy to do against our team. Are we really acting like he doesn’t laugh and go “hahaha mahomes and Reid does it again “ isn’t something he says constantly?
He can’t suck our dick 24/7 and expect to keep a job. [Reply]
I muted the TV in the 2nd half and it was extremely enjoyable. That was maybe the worst 1st half broadcast I can ever remember listening to. F Romo. His analysis has turned into garbage. He’ll be calling game over for the Chiefs next week when they get down early to the Ravens. [Reply]
I think Romo does a good job, but he needs to be a little less affectionate toward Allen and some of the other players he clearly likes and wants to see succeed. [Reply]
I can't stand listening to this turd. I was one of the few who didn't get all the praise he got in the beginning and he's only gotten so much worse over time. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
That was easily the worst he's ever been on a broadcast and he's been pretty bad at times. He seemed convinced for the entire game that the Bills were going to win despite the Chiefs having the best QB ever. It was odd.
Originally Posted by Monticore:
He was trying to will it into existence
I find it flattering tbh. You either get it, or you don’t. I’m a younger generation chiefs fan and that’s probably why I get it because I don’t have the “because chiefs” or “victim mentality” living rent free in my head. Much love though man. If you are old school, I’d buy you a beer in a second. [Reply]