It may be the Niners but they'll have to make a decision on Purdy eventually. I really do wonder when one of these teams will try to "Moneyball" things and just try to cycle through QBs on rookie contracts or inexpensive QBs and try to surround them with super talent. Problem is there just aren't that many good QBs but a lot of guys on that top 10 list haven't won anything either. [Reply]
Originally Posted by tk13:
It may be the Niners but they'll have to make a decision on Purdy eventually. I really do wonder when one of these teams will try to "Moneyball" things and just try to cycle through QBs on rookie contracts or inexpensive QBs and try to surround them with super talent. Problem is there just aren't that many good QBs but a lot of guys on that top 10 list haven't won anything either.
The team to have done that was the Cowboys imo. If Purdy has another year like last year you gladly write the check. [Reply]
They still need to pay Parsons. Should be interesting. Dak is just a product of the current QB market and it shows how fortunate we are with Mahomes. Dallas was in a bind because Dak is good enough to always give them a shot at winning, but not good enough to win it all. In this era any QB that gives you a shot is gonna get paid and be retained by their team. [Reply]
Originally Posted by tk13:
I really do wonder when one of these teams will try to "Moneyball" things and just try to cycle through QBs on rookie contracts or inexpensive QBs and try to surround them with super talent.
I assume that’s what Pittsburgh’s plan is with Fields/Wilson. Just not sure where all the superstar talent is just yet. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
Dak absolutely blows, so....
And again you just post your usual negative comments without actually posting what you would have done as well as who you replace him with and why? [Reply]
Originally Posted by tredadda:
And again you just post your usual negative comments without actually posting what you would have done as well as who you replace him with and why?
You take a shot until you find someone you can actually contend with. It would ve the EXACT same as if we paid Alex and didn't draft Pat. EXACTLY THE SAME. So negative bullshit my ass. It's the hard reality.
Imagine paying Alex 60 million for winning regular season games and playoff choking. Just like Dak... [Reply]
Originally Posted by tredadda:
And again you just post your usual negative comments without actually posting what you would have done as well as who you replace him with and why?
Let Dakota walk and draft Shedeur next year. [Reply]