Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Kelce is a beast... but no, at this point I would take Sutton, Patrick, Jeudy and Hamler over the non-Kelce options you have provided.
First, let me remove by far the best receiving weapon either team has… then we’ll make the comparison. Right.
If you include Kelce, KC has a better playcaller, QB, offensive line and overall set of receiving weapons. The only offensive position group for Denver that exceeds KC’s is running back, but not in any significantly impactful manner. KC’s offense is top to bottom the best in the AFC west and close to tops in the league even without Hill (and yes, Mahomes and Reid being the best at what they do in the most important positions on a football team play the biggest role in that).
Originally Posted by staylor26:
You mean the corpse of Ben Roethlisberger that the Steelers basically forced to retire?
Yes, I do.
The corpse of Ben Roethlisberger had 22 TDs and 10 INTs last year (his worst season). That is better than any Broncos QB has had since Sutton was drafted. [Reply]
The corpse of Ben Roethlisberger had 22 TDs and 10 INTs last year (his worst season). That is better than any Broncos QB has had since Sutton was drafted.
Bridgewater and Lock combined for 20 TDs and 9 INTs last year.
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
They're so desperate to convince themselves that they're on KC's level. Propping up Roethlisberger now? He's been awful for two years.
Roethlisberger has been awful for two years, you're right.
The corpse of Ben Roethlisberger had 22 TDs and 10 INTs last year (his worst season). That is better than any Broncos QB has had since Sutton was drafted.
Have you ever asked yourself why all your QBs have worse results in Denver, with that allegedly great roster (that somehow managed to entirely elude the Pro Bowl)?
Keenum killed it for Minnesota the year before. Turdwater threw for way more yards and a higher comp % for a terrible team the year before. He also went 5-0 for NO a year earlier and 11-5 for Minn a few years before that. Flacco was worse in Denver. Lock was a pretty high draft pick with potential. His stock plummeted each season.
Have you ever considered that maybe your roster isn't nearly as good as you think? [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Have you ever asked yourself why all your QBs have worse results in Denver, with that allegedly great roster (that somehow managed to entirely elude the Pro Bowl)?
Keenum killed it for Minnesota the year before. Turdwater threw for way more yards and a higher comp % for a terrible team the year before. He also went 5-0 for NO a year earlier and 11-5 for Minn a few years before that. Flacco was worse in Denver. Lock was a pretty high draft pick with potential. His stock plummeted each season.
Have you ever considered that maybe your roster isn't nearly as good as you think?
Sounds like you're blaming Denver's coaching. I'd agree. [Reply]