Donk fans have hope for the first time in 6 seasons...I get it. Hope is necessary. The whole AFC West is gunning for the Chiefs, as they should. Will it be enough? I think it will be a helluva road this season for sure. But I think the Chiefs are up to the task. Until proven otherwise, the Chiefs rule the west with an iron fist. I take it as a compliment that the whole division is all in on beating the Chiefs.
But...it's not just about KC. Donks gotta beat two other teams as well. Broncos are in the best shape they've been in since a long time ago...but so is every other team in the division.
The best part is the rest of the division thinks they have the tools to beat KC with the players/offense they were running the last 4 years. Andy is changing it all up, and rolling a different way now. I don’t think teams are gonna be ready for what Andy and Patrick are about to unleash on the league. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Nah... kinda sounds silly to say really. I mean you don't play two SBs.
It's also silly to think that Vaseline on jerseys is acceptable, that you can spend more than the salary cap, or that a new coach every three years is a good plan for success. Thus, it's hard to tell what Broncos fans may see as rationale. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Peter Gibbons:
It's also silly to think that Vaseline on jerseys is acceptable, that you can spend more than the salary cap, or that a new coach every three years is a good plan for success. Thus, it's hard to tell what Broncos fans may see as rationale.
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor:
The best part is the rest of the division thinks they have the tools to beat KC with the players/offense they were running the last 4 years. Andy is changing it all up, and rolling a different way now. I don’t think teams are gonna be ready for what Andy and Patrick are about to unleash on the league.
That's one way to view trading Hill and backfilling him for the time being with marginal 2 and 3 options. As long as Patrick is the QB, anything is possible - I get it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Peter Gibbons:
or that a new coach every three years is a good plan for success. Thus, it's hard to tell what Broncos fans may see as rationale.
You were reaching there, bud... why would anyone suggest doing that every 3 years is a good plan for success? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
You were reaching there, bud... why would anyone suggest doing that every 3 years is a good plan for success?
Granted, any rational person would not think a good plan. Perhaps it helps to have a mouth full of horse teeth and to be drunk most of your life? I am not sure just trying to extrapolate the available data. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Peter Gibbons:
Granted, any rationale person would not think a good plan. Perhaps it helps to have a mouth full of horse teeth and to be drunk most of your life? I am not sure just trying to extrapolate the available data.
Rationale is a noun. Rational is an adjective. The one you want to use here is rational. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Peter Gibbons:
Granted, any rationale person would not think a good plan. Perhaps it helps to have a mouth full of horse teeth and to be drunk most of your life? I am not sure just trying to extrapolate the available data.
I think you need to call it a day and grab a nap. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
That's one way to view trading Hill and backfilling him for the time being with marginal 2 and 3 options. As long as Patrick is the QB, anything is possible - I get it.
Your fan base can’t keep referring to Juju, MVS and Hardman as marginal receiving weapons while touting Sutton, Patrick, Jeudy and Hamler as a great group or even one with realistically very good potential. The latter hasn’t proven an ability to be even above average. They’re JAGs until proven otherwise (Bridgewater isn’t great, but you’d think A good receiver could still do something of significance and not be completely small with him throwing the ball).
KC is almost assuredly adding a top 50 pick at WR and Kelce was and always will be option 1 in this offense until he hits a decline.
Originally Posted by austing24:
Your fan base can’t keep referring to Juju, MVS and Hardman as marginal receiving weapons while touting Sutton, Patrick, Jeudy and Hamler as a great group or even one with realistically very good potential. The latter hasn’t proven an ability to be even above average. They’re JAGs until proven otherwise (Bridgewater isn’t great, but you’d think A good receiver could still do something of significance and not be completely small with him throwing the ball).
KC is almost assuredly adding a top 50 pick at WR and Kelce was and always will be option 1 in this offense until he hits a decline.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Understood... I won't speak for the others, but I don't think it's a reach at all to suggest that Denver's WRs now have a higher ceiling than KC's WRs with Hill gone. Depends on who they draft.
I'm not going to defend the WR group again... I really like the upside though with the new QB and new offensive focused coaching staff.
They guys KC signed... nice #2 and #3 options. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
I think you need to call it a day and grab a nap.
I bet you’re fun at parties too. As evidence of your many friendships, I point to the amount of time you spend trolling a rival fan message board. With that being said, and since it’s not nice to pick in those less fortunate, so I wish you and yours a heartfelt Happy Easter weekend. Hopefully your team’s dreadful leadership (can we really call it that?) will allow you to be relevant again sometime soon. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Peter Gibbons:
I bet you’re fun at parties too. As evidence of your many friendships, I point to the amount of time you spend trolling a rival fan message board. With that being said, and since it’s not nice to pick in those less fortunate, so I wish you and yours a heartfelt Happy Easter weekend. Hopefully your team’s dreadful leadership (can we really call it that?) will allow you to be relevant again sometime soon.