I don't recommend listening to it, but I like having football in my ear during the day.
Fucking shit do I hate hate HATE Jeff goddamn Chadiha.
The Red Gold and Bold podcast with Petro and McDowell came across my feed so I played it. That guy just becomes more and more of an ass-bag every single season.
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
I don't recommend listening to it, but I like having football in my ear during the day.
Fucking shit do I hate hate HATE Jeff goddamn Chadiha.
The Red Gold and Bold podcast with Petro and McDowell came across my feed so I played it. That guy just becomes more and more of an ass-bag every single season.
I hope he gets lupus.
He's a KC guy and everybody knows it so he goes out of his way to make sure everybody knows he's not biased for KC, to the point that he's actually biased AGAINST KC. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
He's a KC guy and everybody knows it so he goes out of his way to make sure everybody knows he's not biased for KC, to the point that he's actually biased AGAINST KC.
Is he?
I swear he's from Michigan. And he works for NFL Media, not 810 or the Star or whatever.
Originally Posted by Raiderhater:
THANK YOU! I was about to go out of my mind. This morning I even looked to see if someone had posted the whole game yet on YT, and NFL had BUT, to help cut down on the time they cut all of the review time - and therefore the replays shown - out. I just threw my hands up and was starting to wonder if I had just imagined the whole thing.
It certainly is not as definitive as I remember thinking it was at the time, but it is still a better shot than either of the field side views and throws more than enough doubt on his reaching the LoG. This whole controversy is stupid. “But the one side judge spotted the ball on the line!” Fuck off.
Sure thing. At the end of the day, it was close, but every still shot I've seen makes it look to me like he fell just short. There is no real controversy here. It's as stupid as claiming the refs shouldn't have called the out of bounds hit on Mahomes vs Bengals in the AFCCG a couple of years ago. This is some serious WEAK shit and it's all they have. [Reply]
I feel like Petro's podcast is literally a paint by numbers podcast, I know what they'll all say before they say it because they're in their roles.
Every now and then Petro and McDowell will flip flop on who wants to "homer it up" more but it's really really annoying how much both of them go out of their way to defend Chadiha to their audience.
It's pretty telling how much worse that podcast is than pretty much anything KCSN does. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch:
Happened in back to back years now. The Chiefs and Bills both turtled to the extreme and let the Ravens eventually implode on their own, and it worked both times.
15-2 is “turtled”? I’m missing your point. [Reply]
Originally Posted by wazu:
Sure thing. At the end of the day, it was close, but every still shot I've seen makes it look to me like he fell just short. There is no real controversy here. It's as stupid as claiming the refs shouldn't have called the out of bounds hit on Mahomes vs Bengals in the AFCCG a couple of years ago. This is some serious WEAK shit and it's all they have.
Looking at that shot, it isn't directly overhead, it's slightly behind the play. I'd be willing to bet that had the camera been directly overhead at that moment, it would likely be indisputable that he was stopped short.
But it's whatever, I've seen enough to satisfy myself and the bitches and cunts out there are going to continue to wail and gnash their teeth no matter what. Might as well just enjoy all of it. [Reply]