Football Broncos news megathread - Page 2781

Originally Posted by The Franchise:
They can do maximum restructures and have more than enough cap space to fit in a new Adams contract.

Basically kick the can down the road when Love eventually becomes the starter.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by The Franchise:
So you’d have no issues with them blowing it up and trading Rodgers somewhere other than Denver, right?

I think their window is closed, and that if they can get premium draft picks for an aging QB, they should.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TEX:
Blowing it up is the absolute WORST thing they could do right now. They KNOW this. Last year showed them what their future looks like with Jordan Love at QB and it SCARED THE HELL OUT OF THEM!
Franchise QB's don't grow on trees. When you have one, you KEEP HIM, because as long as you have him, you're a contender. You have NO CHANCE without one, just ask the Denver Broncos.

They were planning on rebuilding two years ago. What they didn't plan on was whiffing on Jordan Love. The Packers would be in much better shape long-term if they get what they can for Rodgers now. Look at what happened with the Saints when they were in cap hell with Brees, they restructured their team to death and never made it back to the Super Bowl and now they're a dumpster fire.

Originally Posted by TEX:
They'll find the room in the end. You'll see....Remember a couple years back when Bart Vatch kept everyone the Chiefs wanted and signed new players with about $1.25 in cap space? It can and will be done in GB also.

:-)

The Chiefs had a top-5 QB on a rookie deal. They aren't close to approaching the cap situation the Packers and Saints are/were in. The situations aren't the same when your franchise QB is making less than $7M per year.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Any money Green Bay can offer him Denver would be willing to offer him too.

Denver has the 5th-most space in the league.
Green Bay has the 2nd-fewest.

A large contract would hurt the Packers significantly more than it would hurt the Broncos.

:-) @ cap space. Blart Beach found a dime in the Coke machine and signed all of the Chiefs' Free Agents he wanted.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Drew Lock is a poor man's Jay Culter.

WTF is that supposed to even mean...
[Reply]

The 'cap' is a myth.

This has been proven by the Chiefs and several other teams over the last few years.

If you want to make it work, you can make it work.

I imagine the Packers will figure out a way to make it work.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
WTF is that supposed to even mean...

Jay Cutler was a poor man's Jeff George.

MHM...CP has lost its...burst.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
Jay Cutler was a poor man's Jeff George.

MHM...CP has lost its...burst.

Funny stat line... which of these is Jay Cutler and which is Troy Aikman?

Games Started 153 / passing yards 35,133 / passing TDs 227 / INTs 160
Games Started 165 / passing yards 32,942 / passing TDs 165 / INTs 141

And, if what you say is true... then Lock is a 3rd world poverty level Jeff George?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin:
The 'cap' is a myth.

This has been proven by the Chiefs and several other teams over the last few years.

If you want to make it work, you can make it work.

I imagine the Packers will figure out a way to make it work.

At 74 million over...they'll have to make some kind of cuts, but why are we talking about the Packers?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Funny stat line... which of these is Jay Cutler and which is Troy Aikman?

Games Started 153 / passing yards 35,133 / passing TDs 227 / INTs 160
Games Started 165 / passing yards 32,942 / passing TDs 165 / INTs 141

I guess the first one because the numbers are higher and Cutler played in Star Wars league with a demished run game.
[Reply]

Please, where there is a will... there is a way with making the salary cap work. Amirite? C'mon, that shit is easy.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
At 74 million over...they'll have to make some kind of cuts, but why are we talking about the Packers?

Because your fellow Donko homer, KnowMo, keeps bringing it up . . . . .
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
At 74 million over...they'll have to make some kind of cuts, but why are we talking about the Packers?

They can clear all of it up, and have left overs, using restructures.
[Reply]

Knowmo being plaid
[Reply]

I think it is embarrassing to have a thread about the Broncos on a Chiefs forum, if there is a mega thread on the Broncos then where is the Raiders and Chargers mega thread?
[Reply]