Originally Posted by staylor26:
And after all the hype about their roster, they’re right back picking in the top 10 and looking for a new HC.
That doesn’t exactly scream “ready to win now”, especially considering the state of the division.
Knowmo doesn't get that. Why would he want to go to Denver where he has to compete against two of the best young QBs in the league 4 times a year? Plus he might see Burrow and Allen. If he can't win in the weaker NFC with a loaded roster, what chance does he stand in the AFC? [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
And after all the hype about their roster, they’re right back picking in the top 10 and looking for a new HC.
That doesn’t exactly scream “ready to win now”, especially considering the state of the division.
Anybody that watches the Broncos knows that they're a QB away.
If Denver had a QB who guaranteed them 24 points per game (which would've ranked 16th in the league), Denver would've been 12-5 this year. We took you guys to the wire both games, one of them with Drew Lock. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Anybody that watches the Broncos knows that they're a QB away.
If Denver had a QB who guaranteed them 24 points per game (which would've ranked 16th in the league), Denver would've been 12-5 this year. We took you guys to the wire both games, one of them with Drew Lock.
A QB away from being a playoff team? Sure, I could see that.
A QB away from a SB? No, absolutely not. Your roster is not better than the one the Packers have around Rodgers, and again, the division is MUCH tougher.
Rodgers isn’t going to leave GB for anything less than a legit SB contender.
It’s a lot easier to see that path to success in Pittsburgh, Indy, Oakland, or even Philly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Anybody that watches the Broncos knows that they're a QB away.
If Denver had a QB who guaranteed them 24 points per game (which would've ranked 16th in the league), Denver would've been 12-5 this year. We took you guys to the wire both games, one of them with Drew Lock.
Will you leave forever if Rodgers doesn't go to Denver? [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
A QB away from being a playoff team? Sure, I could see that.
A QB away from a SB? No, absolutely not. Your roster is not better than the one the Packers have around Rodgers, and again, the division is MUCH tougher.
Rodgers isn’t going to leave GB for anything less than a legit SB contender.
It’s a lot easier to see that path to success in Pittsburgh, Indy, Oakland, or even Philly.
Denver's roster is better than all of those teams you mentioned. They only had a better record than us due to their QB situation being better than ours.
The Packers D is better than ours, but their weapons on offense aren't.
The AFCW is tough, but the Chargers choke, the Chiefs are top heavy, and the Raiders would be irrelevant with Rodgers, Mahomes, and Herbert in the division. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Denver's roster is better than all of those teams you mentioned. They only had a better record than us due to their QB situation being better than ours.
The Packers D is better than ours, but their weapons on offense aren't.
The AFCW is tough, but the Chargers choke, the Chiefs are top heavy, and the Raiders would be irrelevant with Rodgers, Mahomes, and Herbert in the division.
Will you leave forever if Rodgers doesn't come to Denver? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe: Denver's roster is better than all of those teams you mentioned. They only had a better record than us due to their QB situation being better than ours.
The Packers D is better than ours, but their weapons on offense aren't.
The AFCW is tough, but the Chargers choke, the Chiefs are top heavy, and the Raiders would be irrelevant with Rodgers, Mahomes, and Herbert in the division.
