BREAKING: USC QB Caleb Williams has DECLINED to medical examinations with teams at the Combine and did not sign off on having his medical records shared with all teams.
Williams is believed to be the first combine invitee ever to decline an examination, per CBS. pic.twitter.com/ipHqfxNBYJ
Originally Posted by Lzen:
Did he wear a dress? I mean, that's what I read somewhere, possibly here. If he did then tell me why you think a man wearing a dress is normal.
Nope, scratch that. Even if you do think that a man wearing a dress is normal, I don't really want to know why you think that. It is not normal no matter how you try to justify it.
The only reason I said trans is because that seems to be the big thing these days. I really don't know if that's his thing or if he's just trying to get attention. Either way, it doesn't seem stable to me.
Originally Posted by Lzen:
Did he wear a dress? I mean, that's what I read somewhere, possibly here. If he did then tell me why you think a man wearing a dress is normal.
Nope, scratch that. Even if you do think that a man wearing a dress is normal, I don't really want to know why you think that. It is not normal no matter how you try to justify it.
The only reason I said trans is because that seems to be the big thing these days. I really don't know if that's his thing or if he's just trying to get attention. Either way, it doesn't seem stable to me.
Almost a guarantee your Great Grandpa and maybe Grandpa (depending on how old) wore dresses as a little kid.
Originally Posted by wazu:
Joe Namath wore a fur coat on the sidelines of NFL games he was playing in 50 years ago. Dudes doing things like this is nothing new. It's usually a statement that they are so confident that they enjoy breaking social norms of colors and clothing. There are limits to this probably for all of us. If Caleb walks out to a press conference wearing a dress that'll probably push past the mark. Having a pink phone, though? That's nothing. Zero. Painting nails? That's kinda new for me, but it seems no more effeminate than wearing earrings.
I don't think you can compare the actions of Namath, and damn sure not Rodman, to the actions of many of today's athletes. Both leagues, and society in general, have shifted so far things just aren't the same.
Rodman could do the gayest thing imaginable and people wouldn't call him gay. I highly doubt we'll see this kid rise to that level, but who knows. So far, he's failing miserably. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ENDelt260:
I'm curious to know at least one of these reasons.
The same reason I wouldn't want my kid to have anything else that makes him abnormal. You don't get to tell everybody how hard it is being gay, then act shocked when parents don't want their kids lives to be any harder than they have to be.
Also, because I want my son to have a family of his own one day with my own biological grandchildren. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
You said it yourself. Your "little girls". Not your little boys. Your little girls. That's what they do.
I don't mean that Caleb literally sucks cock because he paints his nails. I'm just saying, as a man, it is objectively gay (meaning effeminate) when you combine the painted nails, pink phone, etc.
Even most girls would say that is pretty gay. Why is that so controversial? :-)
Gay doesn't mean effeminate. Also I don't consider having painted nails as being gay. I don't know very many gay men, but the ones I do know sure as shit don't paint their nails, so I fail to see how it is gay. I'd consider is abnormal or weird for a guy to paint his nails, but only be ause it's not a societal norm. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
The same reason I wouldn't want my kid to have anything else that makes him abnormal. You don't get to tell everybody how hard it is being gay, then act shocked when parents don't want their kids lives to be any harder than they have to be.
Also, because I want my son to have a family of his own one day with my own biological grandchildren.
And how does wearing a pink shirt and pink fingernail polish prevent your son from being straight and having a family? [Reply]
Originally Posted by dlphg9:
Gay doesn't mean effeminate. Also I don't consider having painted nails as being gay. I don't know very many gay men, but the ones I do know sure as shit don't paint their nails, so I fail to see how it is gay. I'd consider is abnormal or weird for a guy to paint his nails, but only be ause it's not a societal norm.
I know the technical definition of gay. Are you really going to play this stupid? People use gay to simply mean effeminate all of the time. [Reply]
Originally Posted by penguinz:
And how does wearing a pink shirt and pink fingernail polish prevent your son from being straight and having a family?
If you had an iota of reading comprehension, you would see that I said multiple times that it's doesn't necessarily mean you literally suck cock. [Reply]
Originally Posted by wazu:
Yep, I remember a time when left ear only was "okay", but right ear meant you were a fully out-of-the-closet homosexual man regardless of how much you deny it.
The 90s were wild lol
It’s weird that we went so far in the other direction immediately after the androgynous 70s and 80s. [Reply]
OK, well I’m glad you figured out this one simple trick that an entire league full of NFL coaches with thousands of years of combined experience never realized while Brees was shredding the league- just have the defensive linemen put their hands up!
Lol I already said THE GUY DOESN'T PLAY LIKE BREES so wtf is your point? Baker and Kyler are the last two short guys drafted number one so how has that gone? :-) Try and move the goalposts If you like but NFL defenses are gonna FORCE him to stand in that pocket and are also gonna drop eight on occasions just like they do to Pat. Both are things teams did to him which lead to him struggling in the last seven games. Fullstop.
Originally Posted by :
And idk what to tell you about the Mahomes stuff. College is different than the pros. Trevor Lawrence would have been the #1 overall pick for like three straight years if he was eligible to enter the draft. There is no shame in saying that he was a better college prospect than Mahomes.
And AGAIN you're ignoring the point I made. IF PAT HAD THE SAME WEAPONS Trevor Burrow, Caleb, Mayfield, Kyler etc all had do you think he would have done worse than them? Anyone with an ounce of football knowledge knows the answer. But carry on bro cheerleading bro :-) [Reply]
