Meh. They aren't a QB away for the draft capital they would have to give up. Although Watson would be a lot cheaper (and younger) than Rodgers I suppose.
[Reply]

Watson has a no trade clause. He will drop it for Miami not Denver. They are not getting him so it seems according to the reports.
[Reply]

Notice how Roethlisberger never made it back to a SB after his rape situation?

Does the NFL really want a billion people watching them pimp a guy with 22 accusations for sexual misconduct? Would they want that kind of "woke" scrutiny for 2 solid weeks...how would their advertisers feel?

I hope Denver spends 3 firsts on Watson...they would be black-listing themselves. That guy is never going to be allowed to sniff a superbowl...maybe 30 years ago...but not now.
[Reply]

He's black. League needs black QBs to succeed. They won't stop him. That's the NFL now.
[Reply]

I wish this had been true.
[Reply]

Then we would be Denver.

Think about that for a second
[Reply]

Yea, in that case... I wouldn't want to go there either.

I don't see Rodgers being too interested either.

But you can always hope Denver finds somebody to blow a lot of draft picks on...
[Reply]

I bet you do! :-)
I on the other hand I'd love to see them stay in Denver forever!
[Reply]

I thought they might keep Fungushole until Rat II became available. Keeping Lance failure alive in Denver.
[Reply]

If you're a real journalist you're supposed to check and confirm stories before you publish them.
[Reply]

This fell to the second page.

How did the Chiefs finish? They switched here for a more "competitive" game...which was the cincy game that the Bengals are winning 41 to 17.
[Reply]

Per Rappoport Broncos in discussions to trade for Watson by trade deadline
[Reply]

good, we can have the cellar to ourselves
[Reply]

Looks like it was a tie. :-)
[Reply]

[Reply]