Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Damn..talk about sympathy scheduling. They gave the Doinks games against the two worst teams back-to-back...3-29 was their combined record...and the 6-10 Giants.
9-39 is the record...of their first three opponents.
I guess the NFL didn't want the Donks season the be over by mid-October....You guys might actually start 3-0/2-1...then lose the next 5. It'll be entertaining to watch the implosion once reality sets in.
Kind of like a few seasons ago when they managed to somehow win three in a row and then lose the next 5 or 6 and finish with 6 wins. That was fun! :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The Chiefs won't. HFA is going to Buffalo. The AFC West is too tough to have the #1 seed in the AFC come out of it.
You know your team is bad when you try to piggy back on the Bills and practically beg your awful front office to give up the farm for Rodgers :-) [Reply]
Looks like Buffalo is gonna have to earn it with a first place schedule now. No worries, they will beat up on lesser teams while being reminded their place when they face KC ala the Ravens. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The Chiefs won't. HFA is going to Buffalo. The AFC West is too tough to have the #1 seed in the AFC come out of it.
The AFC West schedule is easy once you determine that the Chiefs do not have to play themselves. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
Playing the NFC east is not an easy schedule from the West. It's a bunch of plane trips as far as you can go, the teams play tough
Did any of those teams finish above .500 last season? That division sucks. Who’s the best quarterback in that division, Dak? Dungver might be able to win that division (doubtful though). [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor:
Did any of those teams finish above .500 last season? That division sucks. Who’s the best quarterback in that division, Dak? Dungver might be able to win that division (doubtful though).
None of that shit matters. You'll see. KC will be fine, but the rest of the division....not so much. [Reply]