This is horrifying. Supposed to be a press conference soon with more details. Rumors seem to indicate it happened on the Verrukt, the world's tallest waterslide.
Schlitterbahn Kansas City announces Verruckt water slide to be removed after child death in August
41 Action News Staff
5:46 PM, Nov 22, 2016
15 mins ago
Originally Posted by eDave:
I saw one in Saudi Arabia. The head continued to scream for a bit. Then it turned all waxy and greenish. Odd thing to see at 16.
Looks like water slides across the state of Kansas are being outlawed because the son was a son of a Kansas lawmaker.
This sucks if you like water slides. I hate that this happened to a boy and his family but they should outlaw worlds tallest unsafe water slides and not go over bored with this. [Reply]
Looks like water slides across the state of Kansas are being outlawed because the son was a son of a Kansas lawmaker.
This sucks if you like water slides. I hate that this happened to a boy and his family but they should outlaw worlds tallest unsafe water slides and not go over bored with this.
I don't think a simple inspection is particularly overboard. In fact, if it made Chanute shut down a slide that they didn't think would pass inspection and was injuring kids, thats great news. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
Cities are trying to get inspectors lined up to get their slides done as soon as they can, Sartorius said, though he noted “there are virtually no inspectors available.”
While I'm not going to lose my head over this I'm also not going to let this just let it slide by either.What happened to this place? Where's the morbid puns? What happened to the Delta Chi I used to know? [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
Cities are trying to get inspectors lined up to get their slides done as soon as they can, Sartorius said, though he noted “there are virtually no inspectors available.”
Originally Posted by suzzer99:
Didn't the Schlitterban owners say they deliberately picked KS due to its lax regulations? Oops.
If I ask something ominous, but leave it as an open question, can I garner the support of those who simply assume the question to be a statement of fact while remaining inoculated from the burden of actually establishing said fact?
