Originally Posted by RunKC:
Meanwhile in Denver, with a QB that cost less than $2 million a year, they can’t lock up a key player :-)
He shouldn’t have to wait to get paid. He’s that good on the field & OFF! What more could one do? Some teams are getting comfortable under paying players. Keep it real! He earn it! https://t.co/zbvh4gjhLg
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
Not even I am sure Drew can make-up for the rest of the team's issues to get them to that level...
It's way too early to think that Lock will be a good NFL QB. Look up Trevor Siemian's stats and compare them to Lock's at the same time in their respective careers. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
It's way too early to think that Lock will be a good NFL QB. Look up Trevor Siemian's stats and compare them to Lock's at the same time in their respective careers. :-)
While you could be right, let's not forget that CP's resident loud mouths said everything from, "He won't start at MIZZOU" to, "He won't play on Sunday's". I just laughed at their lack of ability to see/know football talent when it's playing right in front of them. [Reply]
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
While you could be right, let's not forget that CP's resident loud mouths said everything from, "He won't start at MIZZOU" to, "He won't play on Sunday's". I just laughed at their lack of ability to see/know football talent when it's playing right in front of them.
I don't think anyone with a brain said he wouldn't start at Mizzou. He was thrown into a starting spot too early and he never really progressed. He was crap against good teams. Denver fans thinking he's a savior are to going to be very disappointed. He has the arm talent, but just isn't a great qb. [Reply]
Originally Posted by GloryDayz:
While you could be right, let's not forget that CP's resident loud mouths said everything from, "He won't start at MIZZOU" to, "He won't play on Sunday's". I just laughed at their lack of ability to see/know football talent when it's playing right in front of them.
We can all identify the type of players that end up as mutts or :-). They're called losers. I blame it on poor coaching from a young age. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pablo:
We can all identify the type of players that end up as mutts or :-). They're called losers. I blame it on poor coaching from a young age.
