Originally Posted by :
A 28-year-old Lake Charles-area woman faces a bevy of charges after Louisiana police said she repeatedly had sex with a 13-year-old boy who she met at the Bible camp where she was a teacher/aide.
According to the Sulphur Daily News, Heather Daughdrill initiated the relationship in June and it continued until a complaint was filed in October. After her arrest on November 29, police told the paper that Daughdrill would pick her victim up from school without his parents' knowledge and subject him to sexual encounters. Louisiana cops also reportedly found sexually explicit texts between Daughdrill and her victim.
Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic:
And then shit like this happens. Judges like this, and the one who gave the Stanford rapist 6 months in county jail instead of prison, because it would effect his future to serve the appropriate 5-7 years in prison, , need to be skull-fu&#ed and ass-raped by whichever sex they are not attracted to.
Justice should be tempered with practicality. It did not serve society to blunt the future contributions of this obviously high-potential producer. [Reply]
Originally Posted by vailpass:
Justice should be tempered with practicality. It did not serve society to blunt the future contributions of this obviously high-potential producer.
You’re a real piece of work, brah.
This “high-potential producer” got caught trying to rape a chick in public. The only acceptable answer for non-sociopaths is lock the fucker up. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Cave Johnson:
You’re a real piece of work, brah.
This “high-potential producer” got caught trying to rape a chick in public. The only acceptable answer for non-sociopaths is lock the ****er up & throw away the key.
Originally Posted by Cave Johnson:
Care to elaborate?
I just feel like court sentencing should be tempered with factors based on the individual's potential to contribute positively to society.
Factors such as education level, their family's societal position and net worth, if they were ever homecoming king or pledged a non-HBCU fraternity, and overall value to their community should be taken into account.
Putting those kind of people in prison along side of the undesirables is not in the best interest of our country. [Reply]
Originally Posted by vailpass:
I just feel like court sentencing should be tempered with factors based on the individual's potential to contribute positively to society.
Factors such as education level, their family's societal position and net worth, if they were ever homecoming king or pledged a non-HBCU fraternity, and overall value to their community should be taken into account.
Putting those kind of people in prison along side of the undesirables is not in the best interest of our country.
Originally Posted by loochy:
Sarcasm mother****er
do you speak it?
Originally Posted by Al Bundy:
It was sarcasm, dude.
Originally Posted by vailpass:
I just feel like court sentencing should be tempered with factors based on the individual's potential to contribute positively to society.
Factors such as education level, their family's societal position and net worth, if they were ever homecoming king or pledged a non-HBCU fraternity, and overall value to their community should be taken into account.
Putting those kind of people in prison along side of the undesirables is not in the best interest of our country.
I’ve been a student of Vail’s twisted psyche for years.
