Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
False. You are an idiot. The Chiefs offense has been good to elite in three of his games. The divisional round was a GOOD GAME for this offense.
Cleveland was the only effort that sucked and he STILL didn't give up a sack.
BULLSHIT AGAIN BY THIS NOVICE!!. The offense last week was not "good". It let up three sacks, 40% pressure rate, were 4/11 on third down, 50 rush yards, less yards per play than Houston and had the ball for seven minutes less too. So please get real and stop sucking Joe's genitals ffs :-) . [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
BULLSHIT AGAIN BY THIS NOVICE!!. The offense last week was not "good". It let up three sacks, 40% pressure rate, were 4/11 on third down, 50 rush yards, less yards per play than Houston and had the ball for seven minutes less too. So please get real and stop sucking Joe's genitals ffs :-) .
The Chiefs had 78 yards rushing on 18 carries.
You can't even get your facts straight. You have to take out kneel downs and punter runs.
The Chiefs offense played an effective, productive game against an elite defense. You don't score on 5 of 7 drives without good LT play. [Reply]
The Texans were moving the ball and gaining yards easier on our defence than vice versa. But we came up with opportunistic stops and sacks to end drives. As well, our offence struggled more than expected, facing this team. Hopefully we play a better game against Buffalo, especially on offence. [Reply]
I dunno, stats are stats. The first drive we had -1 yard, but got 3 pts strictly due to field position, skewing EPA per drive. Just based on the eye test, they had challenges. Maybe Houston improved late season, as they also held the Chargers on offence. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Now it's the fucking eye test :-)
RESULTS are all that matters.
Thuney's pressure rate is not good. Against a more athletic DE like Houston's, he's fine.
It's going to be interesting to see how he deals with the length and strength of a guy like Rousseau. It's a bad matchup for a guy that depends on technique to win because he doesn't play like a traditional LT.
You keep saying it was good enough. Some us don't care about good enough, we want better. Unfortunately, we don't have a better LT. But let's not sit here and pretend playing Thuney at LT is some kind of panacea. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Thuney's pressure rate is not good. Against a more athletic DE like Houston's, he's fine.
It's going to be interesting to see how he deals with the length and strength of a guy like Rousseau. It's a bad matchup for a guy that depends on technique to win because he doesn't play like a traditional LT.
You keep saying it was good enough. Some us don't care about good enough, we want better. Unfortunately, we don't have a better LT. But let's not sit here and pretend playing Thuney at LT is some kind of panacea.
It's GOOD ENOUGH for us to average MORE points per drive in the 2nd meeting.
It's GOOD ENOUGH that we aren't giving up drive-killing insta-sacks like Wanya and DJ.
Some of you gotta WAKE UP. Thuney is the LT and the results are GOOD right now. DAMN GOOD.
ROUSSEAU? Not even in the same stratosphere as what we just faced. :-) [Reply]
The Chiefs have got to get it together. We will need at least 30 points I would think to beat Buffalo, they can score at will. The offense struggled a bit too much for the liking against the Texans and I understand their defense is 100% legit. I think the 'Arrowhead Advantage' is worth about 10 pts. in any given game and that difference allowed the Chiefs to get by the Texans. The Chiefs OL has got to ball out vs. the Bills, Mahomes needs time to throw and only 45 yards to WR's just isn't going to cut it for victory here on out. We have too many good WR's running around for that kind of garbage statistic in a game. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Thuney's pressure rate is not good. Against a more athletic DE like Houston's, he's fine.
It's going to be interesting to see how he deals with the length and strength of a guy like Rousseau. It's a bad matchup for a guy that depends on technique to win because he doesn't play like a traditional LT.
You keep saying it was good enough. Some us don't care about good enough, we want better. Unfortunately, we don't have a better LT. But let's not sit here and pretend playing Thuney at LT is some kind of panacea.
Disagree. I think it’s a better matchup.
Anderson and Hunter are way harder bc they can use speed to power more efficiently than Rousseau [Reply]
