Originally Posted by Chiefnj2:
We attempted more mid and long range passes against Pitt and Houston than we did against SD when Humphries played 85% of the game.
All these narratives that Thuney hurt the long passing game, caused a smaller playbook and hurt the run game are all bunk not supported by the actual stats.
No no no the one dipshit in this thread said it's proof we did not, even tho the numbers say we were still throwing 5 and 7 step drops.
Looks like the coaches saw the same thing the rest of us sane people did. That you go with what works. Not "hoping" that some dude coming off an ACL And hamstring injury is the fix when he's literally never shown to be capable yet. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz:
I would like to point out that Andrew Wylie according to one of our fellow CP posters "blew goats" at RT and we rode him all the way to a SB in 2022.
Originally Posted by Shields68:
Thuney did a good job against some top flight DE's. He did not get beat by speed. Which was killing us prior to him going to LT. He did get over powered a few times. But even then Patrick had time to get the ball out, it was never the oh shit I totally mised .5 second sack. Which I do not think Humphries is moving at 100% and did allow in Denver game.
The times he did, he STAYED BETWEEN THE DEFENDER AND PAT. Which is what you're supposed to do. [Reply]
It is the safe play. Not sure I agree as you have to go with Thuney the entire playoffs now.
But I am not at the practices and maybe Humphrey just doesn't have it. I don't trust Caliendo at all. Wish they would give Kingsley a look there. But don't really want to tinker to much unless we have too. [Reply]