Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
It's still a huge weakness in her game that she needs to improve on.
She’s learning what her lesser skilled teammates can handle, pretty sure she will have fewer turnovers as her career progresses. Your hate for her kinda of reminds me of my hate for former Duke guard Bobby Hurley. Anyway, to be fair, your point of Clark needling to improve on her turnovers is legitimate. [Reply]
I don't follow women's basketball so I don't have context on how different the stats are, but in NBA terms, I'd be way more worried about a PF that shoots under 40% from 2 than a PG that averages 5.5 turnovers. 5.5 turnovers isn't good, but a big who can't shoot 40% is borderline unplayable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jamie:
I don't follow women's basketball so I don't have context on how different the stats are, but in NBA terms, I'd be way more worried about a PF that shoots under 40% from 2 than a PG that averages 5.5 turnovers. 5.5 turnovers isn't good, but a big who can't shoot 40% is borderline unplayable.
Angel has a vision problem. Her eyes are so wide set she has depth perception issues. Plagued her since she was a kid. Kinda sad when you think about the wasted potential because she has Sid from Ice Age eyes. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pablo:
Angel has a vision problem. Her eyes are so wide set she has depth perception issues. Plagued her since she was a kid. Kinda sad when you think about the wasted potential because she has Sid from Ice Age eyes.
Originally Posted by Jamie:
I don't follow women's basketball so I don't have context on how different the stats are, but in NBA terms, I'd be way more worried about a PF that shoots under 40% from 2 than a PG that averages 5.5 turnovers. 5.5 turnovers isn't good, but a big who can't shoot 40% is borderline unplayable.
Meh, if she starts making a higher % of shots she's probably a 16 pt / 10 Reb player. Who plays plus defense. Because she rebounds a lot of her misses it inflates her Reb numbers but it minimizes some of the damage of missing so many easy shots.
Not taking away from her that she's very good by WNBA standards. But it's Clint capela good, where capelas style of play is more valuable to the WNBA that is more physical than it is athletic than it is in the NBA. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kevrunner:
She’s learning what her lesser skilled teammates can handle, pretty sure she will have fewer turnovers as her career progresses. Your hate for her kinda of reminds me of my hate for former Duke guard Bobby Hurley. Anyway, to be fair, your point of Clark needling to improve on her turnovers is legitimate.
Ita not nearly the case anymore that she has lesser teammates. She is the engine but the pieces and parts are more than doing their part now. The team as a whole is much better in the second half of the season. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coogs:
Interesting how UCB's narrative has switched since the start of the season. Sky opened the season at 4-5 and the Fever 1-8. It was all about the wins and not the talent. Since then the Sky is 7-16 and the Fever is 16-8 and now it is about the talent and not the wins.
Haha, I went back and read. You're 100% correct. 😂 [Reply]
Originally Posted by IA_Chiefs_fan:
Haha, I went back and read. You're 100% correct. 😂
I've already explained that the Sky are shorthanded. They traded their best shooter (Mabrey) away and have lost their best playmaker (Carter) to injury lately. Take away Mitchell and Smith from Clark and Indiana would be losing too. [Reply]
