Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
She's breaking turnover records right now and many of her turnovers are from her getting stripped one on one and allowing that player to get an easy bucket. But If you think that deficiency in her game is cool then OK dude :-)
Literally no one cares. This is pathetic. Like when Skip Bayless cried about Mahomes pass to Tyreek in the SB being a "Duck".
Just a really, really pathetic attempt at being a hater. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
Clark, or "the turnover queen" as some are now calling her, has a massive 181 turnovers this season which is 63 more than the player in second place and the worst in wnba history already. She stands on the verge of hitting a monumental number ya'll...TWO HUNDRED TURNOVERS which would shatter all records and has never been done before. And with fourteen games to in the regular season left, I think she obliterates the record books and may hit the 250 to 260 mark. We'll see. Combine that with the playoffs and it could really be off the charts.
And despite that, she's still a rookie sensation that's world's better than Reese. Sad. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ToxSocks:
Literally no one cares. This is pathetic. Like when Skip Bayless cried about Mahomes pass to Tyreek in the SB being a "Duck".
Just a really, really pathetic attempt at being a hater.
How is it pathetic when she's on a record tear for turnovers? This is an issue nomatter how many excuses ya'll wanna make. I'm merely stating facts. No hate at all. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
How is it pathetic when she's on a record tear for turnovers? This is an issue nomatter how many excuses ya'll wanna make. I'm merely stating facts. No hate at all.
Huge franchise turnaround
She’s breaking records right and left. She’s the greatest rookie WNBA has ever seen
The ratings she’s pulling in are through the roof
ChieffyBugger: let’s focus on the turnovers!!!! [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
Clark, or "the turnover queen" as some are now calling her, has a massive 181 turnovers this season which is 63 more than the player in second place and the worst in wnba history already. She stands on the verge of hitting a monumental number ya'll...TWO HUNDRED TURNOVERS which would shatter all records and has never been done before. And with fourteen games to go in the regular season, I think she obliterates the record books and may hit the 250 to 260 mark. We'll see. Combine that with the playoffs and it could really be off the charts.
Peyton threw 28 INTs as a rookie. There's a reason cp doesn't throw a shit fit every time mahomes throws a risky INT. We've lived through Alex Smith. Making more mistakes because you run a uniquely aggressive offense that has created a fearsome identity isn't the flex you think it is.
Do you think the fever would be a better team with Clark being a game manager like almost every other pg and running a slow, safe passing offense? [Reply]
Originally Posted by New World Order:
Huge franchise turnaround
She’s breaking records right and left. She’s the greatest rookie WNBA has ever seen
The ratings she’s pulling in are through the roof
ChieffyBugger: let’s focus on the turnovers!!!!
Ya'll can focus on the good and ignore the bad. That's fine. But I like to look at the bigger picture here. Do you think being a record breaking turnover machine will help her chances to progress in the playoffs? I've seen it cost her in two finals already but folks were happy to ignore it back then too so I guess I can't be surprised that the status quo remains the same :-) . [Reply]
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501:
Peyton threw 28 INTs as a rookie. There's a reason cp doesn't throw a shit fit every time mahomes throws a risky INT. We've lived through Alex Smith. Making more mistakes because you run a uniquely aggressive offense that has created a fearsome identity isn't the flex you think it is.
Do you think the fever would be a better team with Clark being a game manager like almost every other pg and running a slow, safe passing offense?
Peyton was bad yes but that wasn't his game in college. So you could say that that turnover statistic wasn't expected. But Clark was a turnover machine in college too so it may just be who she is. [Reply]
Imagine if white people had argued this much, and invented as many ridiculous ways Phil was "better" than Tiger Woods in 1997-1998.
I honestly think the way people around basketball, men's and Women's, are so invested in Angel Reese being "better" than Caitlin Clark, should be a bigger story, and as a subject matter itself, prime for a deep dive into the sociology and pathology of reasons why these people are pushing so hard for Reese. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
Ya'll can focus on the good and ignore the bad. That's fine. But I like to look at the bigger picture here. Do you think being a record breaking turnover machine will help her chances to progress in the playoffs? I've seen it cost her in two finals already but folks were happy to ignore it back then too so I guess I can't be surprised that the status quo remains the same :-) .
It’s a stupid thing to bring up because if she’s not there they’re not even going to the playoffs. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
She's breaking turnover records right now and many of her turnovers are from her getting stripped one on one and allowing that player to get an easy bucket. But If you think that deficiency in her game is cool then OK dude :-)
She's averaging 5.5 turnovers per game not the 8 that you claimed, you colossal dipshit. 5.5 turnovers per game for a point guard that handles the ball, drives to the basket, and leads the league in assists is not bad at all. Take Sid the Sloth Reece's cock out of your ass and actually watch the games objectively. [Reply]
Originally Posted by LoneWolf:
She's averaging 5.5 turnovers per game not the 8 that you claimed, you colossal dipshit. 5.5 turnovers per game for a point guard that handles the ball, drives to the basket, and leads the league in assists is not bad at all. Take Sid the Sloth Reece's cock out of your ass and actually watch the games objectively.
181 turnovers already is a wnba record by a long way. The facts are the facts.
And for those who keep bringing up Reese. Comparing her to Clark is like comparing Giannis to Curry. They are two different players. One is a vastly better defender and rebounder. The other is a vastly better shooter and facilitator. So I'm not saying Reese is better or Clark is better. They impact the game in different ways but folks love to point out Reese's shooting but get mad when Clark's turnover weakness gets talked about :-) .
And lastly I'm not here to insult or argue with folks. I'm just stating facts and an opinion. Nothing more, nothing less. [Reply]
