Originally Posted by Jerm:
...and Lawler knocked him around for the first couple of minutes.
I'm not claiming robbery or anything but they made the TD out on the commentary to be the biggest thing ever. They were both pushing Hendricks hard throughout the fight so it's not surprising.
Can't believe Rogan thinks Rory deserves the next title shot AND they had a video package of him ready to go...yeah seems legit LOL.
Hendricks was winning that fight if it was close all the way. It's in Dallas and they've been hyping the shit out of him. Posted via Mobile Device [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Hendricks was winning that fight if it was close all the way. It's in Dallas and they've been hyping the shit out of him. Posted via Mobile Device
Agreed...the commentary was borderline embarrassing. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jerm:
Agreed...the commentary was borderline embarrassing.
UFC announcing isn't much different than WWE announcing,hype the guys the company pushes no matter what,sell some storylines. Posted via Mobile Device [Reply]
You don't give a rematch there and Woodley hasn't done shit. You don't go from outside the top 10 to A title shot because a guy you fought tore an ACL [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
UFC announcing isn't much different than WWE announcing,hype the guys the company pushes no matter what,sell some storylines. Posted via Mobile Device
Pretty much...thought it was hilarious that a Rory MacDonald highlight package was ready to go when Rogan "spontaneously" gave his answer. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jerm:
Pretty much...thought it was hilarious that a Rory MacDonald highlight package was ready to go when Rogan "spontaneously" gave his answer.
I'm sure they had Condit penciled in before the injury. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jerm:
How does MacDonald make sense?
Guess I'm missing something...
by default. It's not like he's an obvious choice, but I don't really see anyone else other than Kim. I don't think Lawler gets a rematch, he'll probably need to beat someone else. [Reply]
bizarre twist to the scoring: one of the judges had round 2 10-8 for Hendricks, and had the 5th round 10-10. Well, it still added up to the correct answer, I guess. [Reply]