Denver's winning percentage drops dramatically without those cheap pile high wins. Only team in sports with a cheap ass advantage like that. Pathetic.. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Your post makes no sense. Weren’t ready to pull the plug, but still drafted a guy. Why not take a quality player like Mahomes when you have the chance?
My post makes perfect sense. The Broncos had already spent draft capital on Lynch and they were not yet ready to 86 him. They were not going to, again, trade up for Mahomes. But what the Broncos did do is draft a QB with talent, late in the draft, as a project. It looks like Kelly may indeed pan out. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ:
My post makes perfect sense. The Broncos had already spent draft capital on Lynch and they were not yet ready to 86 him. They were not going to, again, trade up for Mahomes. But what the Broncos did do is draft a QB with talent, late in the draft, as a project. It looks like Kelly may indeed pan out.
:-)
Only to a desperate QB starved team like Denver. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
You're good you "Uncle Tom"...:-)
Its the fools Im talking about. To be specific - Knowmo, Kranz, Toumbstone, Garcia. All talk shit but disappear now. :-)
If you weren't complaining about something, you wouldn't have any posts. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ:
If you weren't complaining about something, you wouldn't have any posts.
Whose complaining? Im LOVING all the "Mr Irrelevant is gonna pan out talk" :-)
If you weren't so delusional, you could tell the difference. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Whose complaining? Im LOVING all the "Mr Irrelevant is gonna pan out talk" :-)
If you weren't so delusional, you could tell the difference. :-)
Project QBs are projects, drafting any QB is a risk/reward scenario. [Reply]
I remember when people here were thinking that Bray "might pan out". We know what it's like to be quarterback starved. Thankfully, those days are in our past now. But that is the present for the Donks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ:
My post makes perfect sense. The Broncos had already spent draft capital on Lynch and they were not yet ready to 86 him. They were not going to, again, trade up for Mahomes. But what the Broncos did do is draft a QB with talent, late in the draft, as a project. It looks like Kelly may indeed pan out.
I remember when Ricky Stanzi looked great in the preseason.
"It looks like Kelly may indeed pan out." According to what? Your preseason games?
Swag was eating shit behind Paxton fucking Lynch nearly the entire offseason. All of a sudden he's a starter?
If I were a Donk fan, I'd STILL be pissed at Horseface for letting Kyle Sloter go. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ:
My post makes perfect sense. The Broncos had already spent draft capital on Lynch and they were not yet ready to 86 him. They were not going to, again, trade up for Mahomes. But what the Broncos did do is draft a QB with talent, late in the draft, as a project. It looks like Kelly may indeed pan out.
Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
I remember when people here were thinking that Bray "might pan out". We know what it's like to be quarterback starved. Thankfully, those days are in our past now. But that is the present for the Donks.
I liked Bray as a project QB, he didn’t pan out, so what? [Reply]
