Originally Posted by Bearcat:
Or maybe some people are always looking for something to cry about, and CFB has a long history of making people cry about shit.
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
The B10 teams they played other than OSU and Michigan were absolute trash, look at their schedule.
Are we giving them credit for beating Nebraska or something?
Depends on how you are basing the win. Overall picture end of season? Yeah that Nebraska win doesn't mean much. At the time though Nebraska was 5-1 and the blew them out.
Overall though their schedule was very weak [Reply]
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
Why does SMU get pushed below Indiana for losing a 3 point conference championship game after having an identical 11-1 conference record with better wins?
There is no answer to this question that the committee could actually give tomorrow that would make any sense after Bama gets in btw
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
Depends on how you are basing the win. Overall picture end of season? Yeah that Nebraska win doesn't mean much. At the time though Nebraska was 5-1 and the blew them out.
Overall though their schedule was very weak
Yeah, my point was that SMU's schedule was actually more difficult than Indiana's (and it was pretty weak too). Despite being in the B10, Indiana had it extremely easy this season.
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
There is no answer to this question that the committee could actually give tomorrow that would make any sense after Bama gets in btw
That's why I fully expect it to happen.
Because the expanded CFP is a glorified SEC/B1G Invitational, with the ACC and Big 12 being relegated to automatic qualifier conferences only.
Some years that might be justified… not the way this season played out though. [Reply]
Originally Posted by FloridaMan88:
Because the expanded CFP is a glorified SEC/B1G Invitational, with the ACC and Big 12 being relegated to automatic qualifier conferences only.
Some years that might be justified… not the way this season played out though.
I mean, middling SEC teams would be 9-3, 10-2 types in the ACC. Just facts. That’s been a top heavy league for more than a decade. You can’t seriously argue that the SEC and Big Ten aren’t head and shoulders above the ACC. [Reply]
Originally Posted by FloridaMan88:
Because the expanded CFP is a glorified SEC/B1G Invitational, with the ACC and Big 12 being relegated to automatic qualifier conferences only.
Some years that might be justified… not the way this season played out though.
That's all it is and all it will ever prove to be, I expect. The bigger power brokers in the sport will invariably get what they want out of the system they created. [Reply]
“I’m just hurting for our guys. I'm hurting because for good reason, their faith in the system is shaken right now. I think they're all in there wondering, are they going to be in tomorrow? Is the fix in or is the right thing going to be done? That's the truth.” - Rhett Lashlee
Originally Posted by BWillie:
The difference is Indiana played a bunch of Big 10 teams.
SMU played a bunch of mid major teams that they call the ACC.
See how simple this is?
Big has like two or three good teams every year; then a bunch of filler turds like Iowa and Wisconsin that would win 6 or 7 games in any conference they were in. [Reply]
