Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
They don't call him Clutch Keenum for nothing
I knew Case Keenum played well down the stretch Sunday but honestly I didn't realize he finished 7-7 & posted a better 4th quarter QBR than Aaron Rodgers did in his historic comeback vs Bears.
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
There was 11:00 left in the game when that happened. Seattle had plenty of time to do something and they never scored another point.
Even if they held Denver to a FG, the Broncos punted while in FG range later in the game and probably would've won 26-24 instead of 27-24.
"Probably" is NOT for certain. That's what's wrong with all of your takes. Let me show you how "probably" works in your mind. If "Probably" will benefit Denver then its for certain. If "probably" will benefit KC - then it is anything but. Get it?
So, once again - no matter what your definition of "probably" is - the FACT is you don't know for certain. However, you do know the correct call was first made of him being out, then after a "conference" the call was changed. It was the winning score. It represents the very definition of a game-altering call. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
Denver scored FOURTEEN points off blown calls. That's ****ing pathetic.
Oh - I know. And needed every one of them, just to barely squeak by a talent deprived Seattle team, while getting to open the season at HOME for the 7th year in a row. Quite Impressive! :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
I didn't say there was a conspiracy about missed FGs...was only stating that their last 3 openers, which they've won by 3 points have all had the opponent missing a FG...two at the end of the game.
Interesting that they let your team almost kill Cam Newton with late, violent hits, none of which were called...and now they wont let them even breathe on a QB.
Interesting indeed, especially since kicking FGs is a lot easier from greater distances at that altitude... maybe the kickers suck? I believe SD's was a rookie - not sure if he's in the league anymore. Jano is like 57 years old and looks to be 270 lbs.
Originally Posted by TEX:
None that were as bad as the two game altering calls that Denver got. This one is not debatable, even for you.
We've covered this one... the fumble that wasn't declared a fumble could have been reviewed, Carrol tried doing so and didn't do it fast enough. I'll have to go find the clip on YT, but I recall watching it live and it was not an obvious call to make live. Maybe they review it and they reverse it ... not Denver's fault for hurrying up to the get the next play off, that's what most teams do in those situations.
I've agreed that I didn't think DT's touchdown was legit... they consulted, made a change to the initial call and review confirmed it. I've seen plenty of calls reversed in that situation. You want a conspiracy theory, so run with it. Maybe the NFL will announce the refs screwed up as they did in the PIT/CLE game.
Again, I'm of the opinion that at 1st and goal at the 4... incredibly likely that Denver scores a TD on 2nd, 3rd or 4th if they go for it
Originally Posted by RunKC:
The Broncos made a rookie TE look like Travis Kelce.
Imagine what Kelce is going to do to them? They can’t cover the TE.
No doubt about that... the kid got loose in broken coverage and exploited them, just as Lockett did on his TD. That happened last year and again, for as long as I can remember - I've seen many opposing TEs play well vs DEN. Kelce and guys like him will chew them up.
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
Denver's defense was getting wrecked by a one man show. 24 points allowed against a team that had no second half wind :-)
Meh... SEA had 15 drives, of which 9 consisted of 3 or fewer plays. Only 4 drives were longer than 2 minutes. Locket and Dissly broke them a few times. But overall, they didn't have many consistent drives.
Two of Keenum's INTs gave SEA the ball with 15 and 41 yards to go to the endzone, those resulted in rather short field scores - which is to be expected when you turn the ball over on that side of the field.
Ugly win overall - I've never painted it as greatness. They won because of the defense, the ground game providing a consistent threat and some solid plays in the passing game. The turnovers were nearly the difference... [Reply]
We've covered this one... the fumble that wasn't declared a fumble could have been reviewed, Carrol tried doing so and didn't do it fast enough. I'll have to go find the clip on YT, but I recall watching it live and it was not an obvious call to make live. Maybe they review it and they reverse it ... not Denver's fault for hurrying up to the get the next play off, that's what most teams do in those situations.
I've agreed that I didn't think DT's touchdown was legit... they consulted, made a change to the initial call and review confirmed it. I've seen plenty of calls reversed in that situation. You want a conspiracy theory, so run with it. Maybe the NFL will announce the refs screwed up as they did in the PIT/CLE game.
Again, I'm of the opinion that at 1st and goal at the 4... incredibly likely that Denver scores a TD on 2nd, 3rd or 4th if they go for it
QUOTE]
Good for your opinion. And somewhere sits Curtis Byner with a different one. Pointis - YOU DONT KNOW FOR SURE - just like your retarded brother Knowmo. [Reply]
We've covered this one... the fumble that wasn't declared a fumble could have been reviewed, Carrol tried doing so and didn't do it fast enough. I'll have to go find the clip on YT, but I recall watching it live and it was not an obvious call to make live. Maybe they review it and they reverse it ... not Denver's fault for hurrying up to the get the next play off, that's what most teams do in those situations.
I've agreed that I didn't think DT's touchdown was legit... they consulted, made a change to the initial call and review confirmed it. I've seen plenty of calls reversed in that situation. You want a conspiracy theory, so run with it. Maybe the NFL will announce the refs screwed up as they did in the PIT/CLE game.
Again, I'm of the opinion that at 1st and goal at the 4... incredibly likely that Denver scores a TD on 2nd, 3rd or 4th if they go for it
QUOTE]
Good for your opinion. And somewhere sits Curtis Byner with a different one. Pointis - YOU DONT KNOW FOR SURE - just like your retarded brother Knowmo.
We've covered this one... the fumble that wasn't declared a fumble could have been reviewed, Carrol tried doing so and didn't do it fast enough. I'll have to go find the clip on YT, but I recall watching it live and it was not an obvious call to make live. Maybe they review it and they reverse it ... not Denver's fault for hurrying up to the get the next play off, that's what most teams do in those situations.
I've agreed that I didn't think DT's touchdown was legit... they consulted, made a change to the initial call and review confirmed it. I've seen plenty of calls reversed in that situation. You want a conspiracy theory, so run with it. Maybe the NFL will announce the refs screwed up as they did in the PIT/CLE game.
Again, I'm of the opinion that at 1st and goal at the 4... incredibly likely that Denver scores a TD on 2nd, 3rd or 4th if they go for it
QUOTE]
Good for your opinion. And somewhere sits Curtis Byner with a different one. Pointis - YOU DONT KNOW FOR SURE - just like your retarded brother Knowmo.
[QUOTE=Mile High Mania;13724931]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Who is Curtis Byner?
I'm a retard. Talk to text.... Ernest Byner. But you get my point. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
They don't call him Clutch Keenum for nothing
I knew Case Keenum played well down the stretch Sunday but honestly I didn't realize he finished 7-7 & posted a better 4th quarter QBR than Aaron Rodgers did in his historic comeback vs Bears.
