He’s got availability (played in 15+ games every year of his career plus 20 additional playoff games). He’s approaching the tipping point for longevity (9 seasons). He’s got postseason success. He’s got individual accolades (four APs). He’s got the peak argument (been a top 5 guard his entire career).
Now he can say that he’s a plus LT? If we win the Super Bowl with him at T, I think you have to say he deserves to get in. [Reply]
No not atm he isn't. Comparing other HOF guards he needs more All pro and Pro Bowl years and needs to play at a high level at least another 4 years. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
Yeah I totally forgot about Butker. I think he needs to keep producing for a few more years though before I'd put him in as a HOF kicker
Butker has a non-zero chance of being the all-time leader in playoff appearances.
He has one more game played than Mahomes. If he sticks around in KC and stays healthy, he'll always be just a tick ahead of PM.
Yeah, I think he's got a shot. The injury this year cost him the All Pro nod he was gonna get, but he'll still get a few more in the future. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Gary Cooper:
If the voters value playoff success more than Pro Bowls and All-Pro teams, sure.
Guard just seems like a difficult position to get in. Very exclusive list. In recent memory, they inducted Alan Faneca and Steve Hutchinson.
Will Shields had more personal accomplishments and wasn't a first ballot pick.
Brian Waters isn't in the HOF, yet his all-pro honors are similar to Thuney's.
Waters doesn't have any championships and let's face it, that's a big thing for voters. Especially when said player has rings with two different teams. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
Yeah Reid, Kelce, Mahomes are the obvious ones. 2 or so years ago Spags, Jones, and Thuney weren't. I'd say all of them should be in