This just says the stadium is in a dangerous area, but doesn't say that it's actually dangerous to be at the games.
[Reply]

That hole in the wall of the toilet stall in the men’s room has been known to traumatize a fella
[Reply]

None of the reporters who were sent to investigate came back.
[Reply]

The stadiums are not in a dangerous area.
Not even close to one.
[Reply]

So it appears once you get in the stadium we are actually pretty nice folks but outside of the stadium....everyone knows Raytown is not so nice

I find it quite comical the same people who talk shit about where the White Sox's stadium is are also Royals/Chiefs fans.
[Reply]

Kiiiiinda is. It could be worse but not much
[Reply]

Yeah if you walk into the stadium from a mile or two out, you might want to watch your back. If you park on the property you have literally nothing to worry about.
[Reply]

They're mostly in a field. No one going to the games is walking through anywhere sketchy.
[Reply]

We used to park up on the hill by Cocos or Adams Mark or whatever that place was called. Everyone that parked up there - and we paid to park - had their catalytic converters stolen.

Also would be nice to have entertainment options near the stadium. I don't think it's as detrimental for football because the game is more of THE experience but for the baseball games it is absolutely awful. Legends is a better spot for both imo
[Reply]

Bill wasn't aware that the Oakland Coliseum had troughs to piss in. You could see a lot junk. Of course if you stared a said junk and had a Chiefs jersey on that could be bad news.


[Reply]

You ever attend an Oakland game?

Philly has a tough reputation as well.
[Reply]

SF didn't even make the cut. Clearly this is BS.
[Reply]

*Santa Clara.

It's a very nice area.
[Reply]