Originally Posted by Coogs:
If we go 4 TE's this year, does that take a WR spot off the table? I have read talk about going with 4 TE's.
No way we carry 4 TE's. That'll be a waste of a spot. WR's tweak stuff all the time. Can miss 3-4 weeks. We have too much talent at WR to sit one on the bench for a 4th TE? Especially with Wiley looking good in camp. [Reply]
Originally Posted by In58men:
Not sure why this rugby player is getting so much hype. I legit said he wouldn’t do much given the history of success rugby players have in the league. It has never worked out lol.
A lot of people said he wouldn’t make it just to hear HiM rUn TwEnNy FoUr MaLl An OwEr [Reply]
Regarding LRZ - didn't we sign him to a 3 year deal? That being the case, I'd be really shocked if he's not active against the Ravens. I suppose they could PUP him or put him on the designated IR list, but I have a real feeling he'll be suited up week 1. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
No way we carry 4 TE's. That'll be a waste of a spot. WR's tweak stuff all the time. Can miss 3-4 weeks. We have too much talent at WR to sit one on the bench for a 4th TE? Especially with Wiley looking good in camp.
Noah Gray has been lining up in that FB/H-Back role a ton, supposedly. I could absolutely see us keeping 4 TEs and putting a couple of the receivers on the practice squad (is Hardman eligible for that, or is he too veteran for the PS now? Maybe even Remigio, even though I want him active). [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bowser:
Noah Gray has been lining up in that FB/H-Back role a ton, supposedly. I could absolutely see us keeping 4 TEs and putting a couple of the receivers on the practice squad (is Hardman eligible for that, or is he too veteran for the PS now? Maybe even Remigio, even though I want him active).
I completely forgot we even signed Irv Smith. That's an insane group of TEs we've got going. The WR room is so much deeper though, too. There are going to be some talented guys who don't make this roster, and we'll just have to hope we can stash them on the PS.
Any veteran is eligible for the PS with the new rules, but I don't think Hardman is getting cut. Man, it's going to be a battle for these WRs and TEs. Should bring out the best in all of them. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bowser:
Regarding LRZ - didn't we sign him to a 3 year deal? That being the case, I'd be really shocked if he's not active against the Ravens. I suppose they could PUP him or put him on the designated IR list, but I have a real feeling he'll be suited up week 1.
I don't know that he's ready for the game day roster but he's perfect for the practice squad. That said doesn't he get some kind of special roster exemption for being a foreigner? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
I completely forgot we even signed Irv Smith. That's an insane group of TEs we've got going. The WR room is so much deeper though, too. There are going to be some talented guys who don't make this roster, and we'll just have to hope we can stash them on the PS.
Any veteran is eligible for the PS with the new rules, but I don't think Hardman is getting cut. Man, it's going to be a battle for these WRs and TEs. Should bring out the best in all of them.
By all accounts Irv has been looking really nice so far. I said at the time that he was an underrated signing. He's flashed some nice potential during his time in the league, just had a hard time staying healthy. [Reply]