I didn't know Dane wore glasses.

And I was disturbed by his telling the 10 year old girl to go masturbate. That's shades of 4chan.
[Reply]

Well, I was going for the sense of blowing a herd of llamas, so I guess I missed the mark, Mr. SNR.

Just kidding. Actually, you've hit it right on the mark.

The dialogue delivery I wanted to achieve was a kind of Stephen Hawking/Star Wars Droid/HAL effect in order to subtly communicate the cultural superficiality and perfunctorily robotic exchange that is so common in the typical conversations conducted in today's society ... like a mirror held up to expose the emotional void and desultory shallowness that comprises humanity's verbal interactions. It's rare for audiences to pick up on those kind of subtleties embedded in a cinematic performance, Mr. SNR, so thank you for noticing.

FAX
[Reply]

:-):-)

two thumbs up fax.



I hope teh next episode has Wendy somehow peeing in his butt. She is too polite and he is too mouthy. So i say have her violently stab him in the leg with a spork and then she can give him the double fishook while pissing in his bunghole. That's the ticket.
[Reply]

:-)
Good stuff!
[Reply]

That was funny. I LOL'd more than once.

It's also an amazing collection of butthurt. I do like the irony of the jabs at people who use insults while also assuming those same people work at McDonalds or hate everything the Chiefs do.

Again, it's not about criticizing everything the Chiefs do, it's about questioning whether or not they are good moves independent of your desire for the team to do well.

It has very little to do with calling someone a cocksucker because they want the Chiefs to win, but very much to do with people's line of reasoning being a) that they want the Chiefs to win and thus can't evaluate the decisions dispassionately and b) the constant fallacy of appeal to authority.

I'd say everyone on here wants the Chiefs to do well, save the Charger, Bronco and Raider fans. The difference is that some realize that want to doesn't equal will.

The true irony, though, is the fact that you made a video parodying one set of "fans" as putting themselves above others, while the implicit message is that your variety of fandom is innately superior.

[Insert Hootie reply about Gholston to meet daily quota of 12 such replies]
[Reply]

I refuse to think of you or the others as victims.
[Reply]

Mr. FAX, there's not enough rep on the fucking Planet for that.
[Reply]

Ok, just watched it. Goddam academy award winning stuff there, Mr. Fax. I was disappointed in the sound track, but I understand it's your first go around. Perhaps next time a march or a lively "adventure film" score would be just the thing. Try it. You never know...
[Reply]

This.
[Reply]

:-):-):-):-):-):-)


Truly a work of art, but I must ask......did you take the dialog direct from CP or was there a certain amount of poetic license?
[Reply]

Yeah, but sometimes shit's just funny cause it's funny.

Then again, I'm no Roger Ebert.
[Reply]

On a film about social commentary?

I hope the ghost of Virgil Thomson posseses the body of Vin Diesel, who rapes you and your family repeatedly with a jackhammer strap-on
[Reply]

No self-indulged commentary here.....Fax, you're the best poster on the planet.

Awsome!

Aw son! (redneck pronounc)

PhilFree:-)
[Reply]

There's no doubting the comedy, that's for sure.
[Reply]

:-), that was awesome!

You know, I remember when I saw Draftabulator for the first time, I thought it said "Drafturbator"
[Reply]