Football Broncos news megathread - Page 1977

Originally Posted by RunKC:
Good thing Denver plays Seattle in the opener without Earl Thomas. They might actually beat that bad team.

Well, maybe. Seattle has the better coach, QB..and punter.

IF they win, it will only be because its at home. Once again, the league gave them a home heavy early schedule to help them get off to a good start. BUT after that, it will be last season all over again.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
He also came thisclose to throwing a redzone PMINT but was lucky the defender dropped it.

Do u count the TD he threw that got called back? Or only the pick he "almost threw?" You know that you are losing an argument when you have to include "almosts." That's like counting preseason wins. Oh wait - YOU DO that. Sorry....:-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan:
I'd compare Kelly to Litton.
And Litton wins that debate too.

Exactly the case.
[Reply]

Chad Cassel...:-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RunKC:
Is “almost interceptions” a stat? Does the league track that?

Good thing Keenum doesn’t throw picks. He also doesn’t throw TD’s :-)

It's right up there with setting up the punter as new advanced stats that quell downtrodden fanbases clinging on to false sense of reality
[Reply]

After last night, it's fairly clear that Paxton Lynch is the Broncos' best quarterback.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TEX:
IF they win, it will only be because its at home. Once again, the league gave them a home heavy early schedule to help them get off to a good start. BUT after that, it will be last season all over again.

They are certain to have 6 loses for sure.
(KC, LAC and RAIDERS ) × 2
[Reply]

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan:
They are certain to have 6 loses for sure.
(KC, LAC and RAIDERS ) × 2

Interesting... winless in the division, you say?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Interesting... winless in the division, you say?

I'd be a little surprised if the Broncos end up winless in Arrowhead, let alone the division.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco:
I'd be a little surprised if the Broncos end up winless in Arrowhead, let alone the division.

Well then prepare to be a little surprised
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco:
I'd be a little surprised if the Broncos end up winless in Arrowhead, let alone the division.

Well, if our young quarterback and rebuilt defense gives you hope to break that 0-5 streak against the Chiefs, then more power to ya I suppose. But I wouldn't be getting my hopes too high just yet. Your team is still way worse.
[Reply]

The results from camp and preseason are in....Denver is a bottom five team by every metric. Uh oh...
[Reply]

Getting Seattle week one in that cheap, thin air is such bullshit as is three early home games yet AGAIN.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball:
Getting Seattle week one in that cheap, thin air is such bullshit as is three early home games yet AGAIN.

Do you sit in a chair, facing a wall... just randomly yelling shit all day?

So, this favorable early record - what's your prognostication?

vs SEA
vs OAK
@ BAL
vs KCC

3-1, 4-0... 2-2, 0-4? What is it..

Next stretch of 4 balances it all out, but that's no big deal, I know.

@ NYJ
vs LAR
@ AZC
@ KCC

Surely, they're like 4-4 ultimate best case, right - likely more like 2-6 based on all that I've read here. So, why you crying?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Do you sit in a chair, facing a wall... just randomly yelling shit all day?

So, this favorable early record - what's your prognostication?

vs SEA
vs OAK
@ BAL
vs KCC

3-1, 4-0... 2-2, 0-4? What is it..

Next stretch of 4 balances it all out, but that's no big deal, I know.

@ NYJ
vs LAR
@ AZC
@ KCC

Surely, they're like 4-4 ultimate best case, right - likely more like 2-6 based on all that I've read here. So, why you crying?

Ok I'm on my phone and I'm not technilogically savvy enough to bold the first statement of your post, but that made me spit root beer out of my nose, that was funny :-)

But yeah 3-5 would be my prediction
[Reply]