Angel Reese takes 89% of her shots from inside 10 feet. She's shooting 50% on layups and 29% from 3-10 feet -- pretty close to league-worst in both categories. Trying to build up this rivalry is a waste of time. It would be like hyping Steph Curry vs. Tristan Thompson.
Angel Reese takes 89% of her shots from inside 10 feet. She's shooting 50% on layups and 29% from 3-10 feet -- pretty close to league-worst in both categories. Trying to build up this rivalry is a waste of time. It would be like hyping Steph Curry vs. Tristan Thompson.
Angel Reese takes 89% of her shots from inside 10 feet. She's shooting 50% on layups and 29% from 3-10 feet -- pretty close to league-worst in both categories. Trying to build up this rivalry is a waste of time. It would be like hyping Steph Curry vs. Tristan Thompson.
Volume shooter. She will get better because she's good at drawing fouls and getting to the rim from the mid post but she's horribly inefficient. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Volume shooter. She will get better because she's good at drawing fouls and getting to the rim from the mid post but she's horribly inefficient.
Meh. My brother says Reese is going to be a plus forward in the WNBA. Above average, but not elite, probably not even great. He's pretty good at evaluating basketball players, so I'll believe that for now. Though she obviously doesn't know how to dribble properly (not sure how you get drafted into pro league without knowing how to dribble but whatever). [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Meh. My brother says Reese is going to be a plus forward in the WNBA. Above average, but not elite, probably not even great. He's pretty good at evaluating basketball players, so I'll believe that for now. Though she obviously doesn't know how to dribble properly (not sure how you get drafted into pro league without knowing how to dribble but whatever).
I am in agreement. But Nowhere near Clark's level and she won't ever be the star. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Volume shooter. She will get better because she's good at drawing fouls and getting to the rim from the mid post but she's horribly inefficient.
She is efficient in rebounding her own missed shots. Easy way to pad those double-double totals. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Meh. My brother says Reese is going to be a plus forward in the WNBA. Above average, but not elite, probably not even great. He's pretty good at evaluating basketball players, so I'll believe that for now. Though she obviously doesn't know how to dribble properly (not sure how you get drafted into pro league without knowing how to dribble but whatever).
She is if Tristan Thompson or Andre Drummond were decent free throw shooters. Which is good. But nobody in their right fucking mind is entertained by it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Meh. My brother says Reese is going to be a plus forward in the WNBA. Above average, but not elite, probably not even great. He's pretty good at evaluating basketball players, so I'll believe that for now. Though she obviously doesn't know how to dribble properly (not sure how you get drafted into pro league without knowing how to dribble but whatever).
