Originally Posted by Marcellus:
I already put $ on KC while the line is Houston -2.
Vegas doesn't care as long as they get the money evenly split, they are clearly trying to get people to bet KC who hasn't been covering the spread all year.
By Saturday the spread will be KC +2 or so is my guess unless they announce Pat is out.
Vegas can tell you a lot, but not everything. And even then you have to know WHEN to pay attention to them. [Reply]
Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
I probably wouldn’t play him.
Not my call though. It’s up to Pat and Andy.
I bet he plays.
If it was a playoff game, I know he would play. I can guarantee he'd also play if the division was on the line.
But in this scenario against the Houston Texans with another game 4 days later where a loss doesn't even eliminate our seeding advantage on the Bills? I'm not seeing it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
That's an interesting spin. Those who aren't scared of taking a chance are cowards. :-)
So afraid of a slightly higher chance of having to play an extra playoff game that they'd throw Mahomes to the wolves and potentially jeopardize everything.
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
So afraid of a slightly higher chance of having to play an extra playoff game that they'd throw Mahomes to the wolves and potentially jeopardize everything.
That's true fear.
The jeopardy is overblown. Stop being a pussy. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
So afraid of a slightly higher chance of having to play an extra playoff game that they'd throw Mahomes to the wolves and potentially jeopardize everything.
That's true fear.
So, by your definition, Mahomes is a coward too, yes? [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Imagine if we roll with Wentz and lose on Saturday (likely) only to give Mahomes 3 more days worth of rest for a mild injury.
Then we have to play a Broncos team that might be playing for seeding, lose that game and don’t get a bye week at all
But if Pat plays this weekend, the season is over! How can you not understand that?!?!? [Reply]