Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Gotta be a Joe Cullen thing? I mean I trust the guy, but it is odd.
Even if it's a Cullen thing, even when Danna went down you couldn't find a dozen snaps for the guy?
If he's still buried behind Malik friggen Herring, what could there POSSIBLY have been on tape to convince you that he was worth acquiring?
Sometimes I wonder if there's a bit of a disconnect between the front office and coaching staff on these smaller moves in the margins. But in an organization this well run, that seems unlikely.
I mean, unless they asked Cullen while he was out there running a drill and he was just like "Sure, fine, whatever - have at it Brett. I'm sure it'll be great...{blows whistle}..."
Herring played 40% of the snaps last week and he's the Jaggiest Jag to ever Jag. [Reply]
Friendly reminder that this appears to have pre-dated Cullen. Not saying he didn’t push for the kid but the Chiefs met with Uche when he was in the draft process. I remember us talking about him being a nice fit here. I bet Veach liked this kid. I remember Veach saying in a presser that they run through everybody in the draft process in case they are ever available in future years, like this move.
Thanks Dante for making the prospect tracker threads every year. They come in clutch for times like this.
Originally Posted by TLO:
I'm tired of reading about the OL.
Has this guy done anything worth mentioning?
He looked good against the Bucs and did absolutely nothing against Denver.
The DL writ large looked so bad against Denver that I still think it had to have been an overarching contain strategy. What they were doing in that game just didn't make sense to me. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
He looked good against the Bucs and did absolutely nothing against Denver.
The DL writ large looked so bad against Denver that I still think it had to have been an overarching contain strategy. What they were doing in that game just didn't make sense to me.
Could be. Bo didn't get any cheap rushing yards this week [Reply]