I've been toying until now........you came in here calling posters "stupid", questioning their manhood and erectile function, then mention that you have many ways to "arouse men". You come in here like that, and I'm not using the Cabbage patch treatment. Believe it or not, I've been far more than "gentle" with you, compared to what it could be. I'd advise you to select another sparring partner to trade insults with. I wouldn't be intimidated by you, and every lawyer you know in a battle of wit.
Chief fans are easily enthralled with Rookie FA Success Stories......Mike Mazlowski, Eric Hicks, Dante Hall, Priest Holmes. I'm sure the guy works hard. I'm sure he was talented in college. I'm sure he was not drafted and spent the first half of the season on the practice squad because he was too good. If he works hard, plays hard, and shows a flash when he gets an oportunity, Fans will flock to his corner. The fact that he's playing BEHIND those underperformers, leads me to believe he WILL be Great...........Great at being a Shift manager at Costco.
If you've got some team dirt...........Dish it up. Which Linebacker is he better than? Beisel? Mitchell? Maslowski? [Reply]
Rich....................If you're reading...........Its obvious this broad is in desperate need of a good Poling.....maybe in the dirty place. A real man would have this chic baking him a pie instead of writing checks on the internet his play hasn't cashed yet .
....and use your legs and hips to drive through those tackles...........Don't let a WR slap you like a sissy on the sideline........Fans hate that in a LB. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Iowanian:
Rich....................If you're reading...........Its obvious this broad is in desperate need of a good Poling.....maybe in the dirty place.
....and use your legs and hips to drive through those tackles...........Don't let a WR slap you like a sissy on the sideline........Fans hate that in a LB.
One more thing, Rich; no K-Y.....al naturale' :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by ROYC75:
It is also the opinion of one that many would not accept it and would continue to be a critical for the sake of being critcal.
You mean like you in regards to Larry Johnson? :-) [Reply]