Originally Posted by Raiderhater: :-) If nothing else, I feel confident in saying that even if not a %100 definitive, it is a more definitive view than either of the two side shots that everyone keeps using.
Just watched the play on All 22. Unfortunately the one sideline cam view is from the Chiefs sideline, staring right at Allen's back. The ball is completely out of view. [Reply]
Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan:
My favorite is Portnoy of Barstool sports wrote his disgust in a heck of rant. Boycotting the SB.
Seems he lost 1 million betting on Bills.
He has a net worth of 100 million. Frankly, that isn't high enough to be wagering a cool million on a sporting event. Maybe 100 grand, but a million?
That said, for a guy that's a Patriots fan to be whining about "cheating" just bolsters the fact he is completely full of shit. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Just watched the play on All 22. Unfortunately the one sideline cam view is from the Chiefs sideline, staring right at Allen's back. The ball is completely out of view.
I’ve never had any kind of access to the All 22 so I am completely ignorant as to what you can actually watch, but does it not provide access to the “eye in the sky” cam? [Reply]
Originally Posted by wazu:
How old was he? Those guys both died like 30 years ago. And why would it piss you off? I welcome all on the bandwagon. We need soldiers to be out there fighting against a tidal wave of haters.
Exactly.
My buddy and I were talking about Kelce and all the crazy shit. He asked me if I knew how old Jerry Rice was. I guessed 62 and he’s like he’s 63, but I had no clue he was that old. Seemed like he should be 50s.
It’s because we’re old. Anybody that was 10 in 1993 is now over 40. Virtually no one in their 30s were too young to have seen the Montana times. And probably half the fans under 45 because a lot of dudes don’t get in it until they start playing football.
Originally Posted by chinaski:
He has a net worth of 100 million. Frankly, that isn't high enough to be wagering a cool million on a sporting event. Maybe 100 grand, but a million?
That said, for a guy that's a Patriots fan to be whining about "cheating" just bolsters the fact he is completely full of shit.
Do the math on 1% of your total equity and then consider betting it on a team you hate.
Originally Posted by Raiderhater:
I’ve never had any kind of access to the All 22 so I am completely ignorant as to what you can actually watch, but does it not provide access to the “eye in the sky” cam?
Not on every play, no. Generally, there's a sideline view and an end zone view for each play. On this one, the sideline view is on the wrong side. Allen turned away from the Chiefs bench, completely obscuring the ball. [Reply]
Wow, just now seeing that Portnoy lost $1M by betting against the Chiefs. Figured he lost something significant after seeing his foaming-at-the-mouth crazy guy rant, but damn.
If he truly believes it is rigged, he should take the rest of his money and put it all on the Chiefs to Win Super Bowl 59. If it's rigged then that is all just free money. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Not on every play, no. Generally, there's a sideline view and an end zone view for each play. On this one, the sideline view is on the wrong side. Allen turned away from the Chiefs bench, completely obscuring the ball.
That’s just odd. I know they have the footage, why wouldn’t it be included? Unless…
Originally Posted by Raiderhater:
That’s just odd. I know they have the footage, why wouldn’t it be included? Unless…
The conspiracy grows deeper!
My guess is the people that stitch together the All 22 didn't feel it was controversial enough to include it. They went with the two standard views, just like most every other play.
Obvious, the NFL isn't ever going to lend credence to any idea that the game is rigged. They have no reason to. [Reply]
I was waiting for them to run a misdirection pass or option and they never did. It was doubly weird when the Chiefs scored twice doing that very thing.
Yeah we talked a lot about "tendency breakers" around here in regards to the Chiefs. Buffalo not only didn't break tendency, they double and tripled down on their approach regardless of outcome. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kysirsoze:
Yeah we talked a lot about "tendency breakers" around here in regards to the Chiefs. Buffalo not only didn't break tendency, they double and tripled down on their approach regardless of outcome.
Exactly.
They kept going back to the same well. Meanwhile, Andy picked a couple of plays he borrowed from the Ravens, two plays Orlovsky said he'd never seen the Chiefs run before. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
One of them is actually saying they wish they had the Chiefs offensive line over the one they have...
Completely delusional. Mahomes has had 6 different guys at Left Tackle in 3 seasons, which is a ridiculous amount of instability at such an important position. Josh Allen has had Dion Dawkins for 7 years. Dawkins has been healthy for 99% of those games, which is remarkable luck at Left Tackle for both the QB and the Buffalo team in general. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DRM08:
Completely delusional. Mahomes has had 6 different guys at Left Tackle in 3 seasons, which is a ridiculous amount of instability at such an important position. Josh Allen has had Dion Dawkins for 7 years. Dawkins has been healthy for 99% of those games, which is remarkable luck at Left Tackle for both the QB and the Buffalo team in general.
That's just the LT. I think they're better at RT too. Obviously, they don't have a Thuney or Creed but their interior line is still pretty damn good. [Reply]
