That's a good idea. Trade 2 1st rounders plus more for a WR that you'll immediately have to give over 10% of your cap to. Oh, and he's coming off a broken ankle.
[Reply]

Right after Manning retired
[Reply]

The Bills could trade #12 and #21 to Denver for #5.

Denver could trade #12 and Emmanuel Sanders to the Giants for OBJ.

The Bills would trade #5, and a future first to the Giants for the #2 pick.


Denver turns the 5th pick and Emmanuel Sanders into: OBJ and #21

The Giants turn OBJ and the 2nd pick into: #5 overall, #12 overall, a future first from Buffalo, and Emmanuel Sanders.

The Bills get their QBOTF
[Reply]

The Rams want two first round picks for OBJ....but yeah sure....they'll take a 1st rounder and Emmanuel Sanders. In what world is Sanders worth a 1st round pick?
[Reply]

:-) get off madden knowno
[Reply]

And why wouldn't the Bills just trade #12, #21 and a first round next year to move to #2. Why do they need to involve the Broncos?
[Reply]

It’s more likely NYG trade with the Bills as their GM’s were together in Carolina.

Would be pretty stupid for Denver to trade down when they have 4 picks in the top 100 and more ammo to move up.

But sure. I would love it if Elway trades out of 5 to miss out on very good talent in the top 10.
[Reply]

#12 overall is worth two late first rounders. Sanders is thrown in because Denver can't afford to pay three WR's $10M+
[Reply]

Because the Giants don't want to leave the top 5.
[Reply]

If the Browns do go with Saquon at #4, Denver is basically passing on Chubb or Nelson in order to get OBJ and a guy like Will Hernandez
[Reply]

:-) #12 and Sanders for OBJ. I'm sure the Giants will swarm all over that one.
[Reply]

Biggest thing with Odell is you've gotta give up all that and pay him. If it were just one or the other, sure.

But both seems pretty steep.
[Reply]

Please do this. Would be hilarious to see your cap wrecked after paying OBJ.
[Reply]

He'll be making like $2M more per year than Sammy Watkins :-)
[Reply]

He wants 20+ million. You really suck at math.
[Reply]