Because of all the interest in this thread, I've place all of the video content of Patrick Mahomes II's college career, and draft day goodness into a single post that can be found here. Enjoy! [Reply]
Ok...I know I am showing my ignorance on this stuff. I have never had to use nor would I if it is limited in its usability as it appears if you cannot do those easy minimal requirements kind of things. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
While I don’t play FF, all the guys I work with do and they always say to NEVER take a QB #1
I don’t get it, if I played he is my first pick every fucking time
It's normally the scoring, a RB is going to be most reliable for points and there is a bigger drop off in points once the top ones are gone. You can still find QB's that will do well in fantasy in the 7-10 rounds. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Sorce:
It's normally the scoring, a RB is going to be most reliable for points and there is a bigger drop off in points once the top ones are gone. You can still find QB's that will do well in fantasy in the 7-10 rounds.
Mahomes just operates on a different plane, seems like he’d be worth it [Reply]
Originally Posted by Easy 6:
Mahomes just operates on a different plane, seems like he’d be worth it
I'd be ticked if I got stuck with someone like Joe Flacco in the later rounds, while watching Mohomes tear it up every Sunday, knowing I passed on him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
If your league has passing TDs worth 6, do it. Otherwise, no way.
Again it's all about how your league scores. The one I'm in is 1.5 per 10 for TE's. Elite TEs are a better option than a lot of WR. Flex TE is equal to flex WR in most cases.
I'm keeping Mahomes for a 1st but I also pick at the end of the round in a keeper league and give up no picks for Damien Williams and James Conner with the way my league rules work. Also a lot of people will be giving up first, second, and third round picks for keepers. This will allow me to go WR and RB early, possibly TE but the best of those will probably be kept. [Reply]
