Originally Posted by Chiefs=Good:
One person's views on 3 players doesn't equate to every one of us being homers knowmo. Id say that it would be incredibly homerish to think a roster that has finished below another - 2 years in a row, while ageing and losing top players is superior. But chiefs fans are the homers? :-) irony buddy and YOU'RE completely unaware of it.
I'm aware that I can be a homer and try to check myself if the other person is being fair with their arguments.
I know the majority of people on CP aren't homers, but they don't correct the Chiefs homers in this thread very often. [Reply]
Btw, vegas odds, twitter opinions. None of that is anything to use to back up an argument. If you cant prop up your own opinion without use of someone else's, then id say your argument is faulty to begin with. None of that proves anything, and the fact you think it does is beyond hilarious. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
I'm aware that I can be a homer and try to check myself if the other person is being fair with their arguments.
I know the majority of people on CP aren't homers, but they don't correct the Chiefs homers in this thread very often.
You are in the top 5 of homers on this board dude. Everyone else can see it but you. You have no business calling anyone else a homer. I enjoy the times you are balanced or giving opinions on general football and not just bronco related info, but generally speaking your bronco takes are as homeristic as it gets.
Lets not forget this is a chiefs board btw. Countless arguments take place on here everyday with both negative and positive opinions on chief related moves etc. Its not this big homer board you make it out to be - and even if there are some, what did you expect? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania: I can be a condescending prick, no doubt.
What general ugliness have I displayed in the last few months?
Did you happen to catch the Tebow/McFail reference? The bolded was your general attitude which is exactly why I stated you are fine with "us" as long as we are below you, you get real ugly when that is taken away. [Reply]
Christ, even ths so called experts, are wrong all the time. I can find someone on Twitter to support any side of an argument i want. And that's just it, opinions differ. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Really??? :-)
Go find examples yourself. Plenty over the years in your responses to me and Stevie Ray, just to mention a couple of starting places. Last few months, you're safe no doubt - but again, that's your thing and COchief said as much.
There's no doubt that to a few of you, I've likely said something fairly direct and nasty... I mean, you guys likely didn't do anything to drag it out of me. I'm sure.
I like places like this that encourage sligning smack... some of you just get more butthurt over it at times. The instances you refer to are so few and far between, but hang on to them by all means. [Reply]
Those betting lines are obviously to pull in easy dollars from the delusional Bronco fans and nothing more. The broncos are legitimately a bottom five team in the league when looking at roster/coaching/executive management. They have zero chance of winning the SB this year or in the foreseeable future unless Elway has another HOF QB fall into his lap. [Reply]
Originally Posted by COchief:
Did you happen to catch the Tebow/McFail reference? The bolded was your general attitude which is exactly why I stated you are fine with "us" as long as we are below you, you get real ugly when that is taken away.
You're gonna have to help me out there... assuming that is about Josh? I'm totally not connecting the dots here on this abomination that I apparently laid upon you during the Tebow years.
Let me ask you this - during the end of last season and all this offseason, have I not been positive in my comments about the Chiefs - specifically Mahommes and his upside? I know that someone got upset that I said he 'looked solid' rather than saying he looked like the next great QB. [Reply]
