Chiefs How a pair of attention whores destroyed any ounce of credibility they ever had - Page 155

TL;DNR

Y'all wanna cry over our last loss and yes it sucked but I got over it, because I'm still celebrating LIV & looking forward to more Super Bowl glory.
[Reply]

We never had it so good.

Maybe go back to Pissoli years where players blow their heads off?

Our team that we love had premature ejaculation in first half blew it's load and couldn't get it up in the second half. That's how the game went down. Next season with this offensive line will have Viagra in second half.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Rasputin:
TL;DNR

Y'all wanna cry over our last loss and yes it sucked but I got over it, because I'm still celebrating LIV & looking forward to more Super Bowl glory.

This is the way
[Reply]

So, who is the player we’re going to lose by their trade demand?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
I'm happy for EB. But Frank Clark did more to get us that. And people fucking HATE Frank Clark here.

EB is tarnished.

"That motherfucking trophy got my fuckin' owner's name on it"

All Hail the Clarks.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by threebag02:
So, who is the player we’re going to lose by their trade demand?

Hard to say.

I can imagine CEH being disgruntled.
[Reply]

Clay, Marty, and all those involved should be embarrassed and discredited by all this stuff.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup:
all this stuff.

what stuff?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
what stuff?

All of the information that has come out from players and those that are in the know instead of you noodle throwers.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup:
All of the information that has come out from players and those that are in the know instead of you noodle throwers.

not one single team source, or national media insider, has come out and said "this is inaccurate"
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
not one single team source, or national media insider, has come out and said "this is inaccurate"

Nate Taylor said he was beloved inside the building and the Chiefs wanted him back. Direct contradiction to your narrative.

Hill and Fountain both went out of their way to vouch for him.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Detoxing:
Remember when you declared Gore our best back? :-)

You're literally wrong all the ****ing time.

Considering EB never really used him much, I'm not sure any of us know what we don't have in Gore.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
not one single team source, or national media insider, has come out and said "this is inaccurate"

Man, this is conspiracy theory 101. In what was written and published you posited several statements which are inarguable. How is somebody supposed to argue against an unfalsifiable argument? Can't the case simply be they did not see a reason to respond to something which is impossible to prove? It's like stating you know for a fact that Mr.X eats human babies and drinks their blood, then saying that your proof is that nobody has proven that Mr.X does not consume babies. How can a person possibly prove they don't consume babies when it is not true?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
not one single team source, or national media insider, has come out and said "this is inaccurate"

:-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by bowener:
Man, this is conspiracy theory 101. In what was written and published you posited several statements which are inarguable. How is somebody supposed to argue against an unfalsifiable argument? Can't the case simply be they did not see a reason to respond to something which is impossible to prove? It's like stating you know for a fact that Mr.X eats human babies and drinks their blood, then saying that your proof is that nobody has proven that Mr.X does not consume babies. How can a person possibly prove they don't consume babies when it is not true?

Yeah, and they probably don't scour message boards and reddit to discount those opinions, either. Just because this piece of fan fiction was spread around doesn't mean it's any worthier of their time to discredit.
[Reply]