Originally Posted by :
Since April’s WNBA Draft, revenue from the WNBA’s official online store is up 2,260%, already blowing past total sales for the entire 2023 season.
While the numbers may cool somewhat as teams settle into their seasons, the pop in demand has already overwhelmingly delivered for the WNBA in 2024.
The old lesbians just need to shut up and dribble while letting the young girls shove their weight around when the bargaining agreement comes to the table next year. It'll be a win for everyone involved if they just let it happen. [Reply]
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501:
She's averaging almost 18 pts, 6 assists, 5 RBs as a rookie with 1 month to prepare against a league that is playing defense on her like she's Jordan. She's doing about as well as you'd expect even a great player to play.
Poor defensively and 51 turnovers. They called her "the goat college player" so I'm judging her accordingly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
Poor defensively and 51 turnovers. They called her "the goat college player" so I'm judging her accordingly.
Lol, wait, wut? Your saying that to be a great player she has to be a great defender? Where does anyone credible say that? There’s literally dozens of past NBA players that weren’t good defenders but were considered among the best players based solely on their offensive abilities.
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Lol, wait, wut? Your saying that to be a great player she has to be a great defender? Where does anyone credible say that? There’s literally dozens of past NBA players that weren’t good defenders but were considered among the best players based solely on their offensive abilities.
Stop making shit up.
That poster said "she's doing as good as possible" and I merely pointed out THE FACTS. She HAS been poor defensively and she HAS turned the ball over at a HISTORIC rate. Ya'll love to throw out her points per game and assist stats so why can't the deficiencies be talked about aswell? Grow up fgs and stop crying over facts :-) . [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
That poster said "she's doing as good as possible" and I merely pointed out THE FACTS. She HAS been poor defensively and she HAS turned the ball over at a HISTORIC rate. Ya'll love to throw put her points per game and assist stats so why can't the deficiencies be talked about aswell? Grow up fgs and stop crying over facts :-) .
I actually haven’t watched a single game. I don’t really care. Just pointing out that your requirements for being a “great” player are BS. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
I actually haven’t watched a single game. I don’t really care. Just pointing out that your requirements for being a “great” player are BS.
Even when you focus solely on her offensive numbers her officiency stats have left a lot to be desired. Especially from three. With hype comes expectations and I'll be judging Caleb Williams the same way too. [Reply]
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
Even when you focus solely on her offensive numbers her officiency stats have left a lot to be desired. Especially from three. With hype comes expectations and I'll be judging Caleb Williams the same way too.
You seem to want to base efficiency numbers based on NBA type stats. WBNA is a lot less efficient accrossed the board about 7% accross the board. Given the defensive attention she is drawing, the number of games they were scheduled and her coming off of a long colleage season she is doing amazing to be right around league average.
But it is the WNBA and absent watching Clark play is still unwatchable. You can see better athleticism then your girl from LSU at any local Y at noon. [Reply]
Having watched some of the women's college bball tourney and my first taste of the wnba here's what I gathered.
The wnba is boring. It's like watching a bunch of lu dorts with a bill cartwright jump shot. They're all big and physical, and the refs don't really call anything. To their credit they're not flopping like soccer or the nba. Even sharpshooters like plum are kind of brawlers with a deadly accurate push shot. It just ain't for me. So I hope Caitlin doesn't change her game. She's quick and fluid in ways others are not and that's why she's popular. Bueckers and juju Watkins in college will bring that same dynamic. Even angel reeses ex teammate flau'jae.
And the old guard needs to shut the fuck up and understand it's that old brand of basketball that bores everyone. That's why I have zero interest in wnba games that don't involve clark. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dlphg9:
It's because he absolutely hates white people. He's a blabbering racist.
Lol oh look one of the main cry babies has spat his dummy out again and Is spewing the same old tired gibberish because he's not intelligent enough to counter any points I've made 👶 :-) [Reply]
