They should be 1-2. That is true.
[Reply]

more like 0-3
[Reply]

Imagine if that clown Sanders didn't go bush league last off-season...
[Reply]

1) I absolutely hate coordinators being on the field. Always have. Anything you gain by being able to rah-rah the troops you lose by having very little view of the play that just happened.

Take your ass to the booth.

2) KC's offense has never, in 3 games, had anything close to the feel of being in rhythm. Each play feels like pulling the lever on a slot machine.

There is no one aspect (passing or running) that we can use to build a foundation on. There's no starting point. It looks like 11 confused men praying that someone else makes a play.

3) Any momentum our offense may get Reid negates with stupid HC/game decisions...
[Reply]

Not sure why Broncos even play... according to all the experts here, kc is much better, even though the scoreboard of the last two games does not reflect this reality.
[Reply]

Denver has played 2 winless teams and us.
[Reply]

Even knowmo knows they are done
[Reply]

But KC is the awesome, remember? Best Defense in the NFL. Unstoppable running game. Speed at every position. Legit WRs. Etc., etc., etc.
[Reply]

Only the homers believe that.
[Reply]

Took five fluke turnovers for Denver to even have a chance RJ.
[Reply]

Vikings are legit, but so is Denver's defense. Facing a QB like Bridgewater will be interesting. AP will produce, it's all about containing him. Good luck... I thin Denver wins 23-17.
[Reply]

5 fluke turnovers, really? Let's look at the definition of fluke, shall we?

fluke
flo͞ok/Submit
noun
unlikely chance occurrence, especially a surprising piece of luck.
"their triumph was no fluke"

You can't have 5 "fluke" turnovers by definition my friend. 5 Turnovers are no fluke.
[Reply]

Fluke... whatever. Broncos have created 10 turnovers in 3 games. Five is high and the game was close, but it's a win.
[Reply]

Riiiight :-)
[Reply]

I am not a believer in this team, but 3 fumbles in one game is rare.
[Reply]