EXCLUSIVE: Nearly two months after Travis Kelce tried to give Taylor Swift his number, a source tells The Messenger that the duo has indeed linked up https://t.co/uQOUsu4Ghe
Originally Posted by :
Nearly two months after Travis Kelce tried to give Taylor Swift his number, a source tells The Messenger that the duo has indeed linked up.
"Taylor and Travis have been quietly hanging out," the source said. "She saw him when she was in NYC a few weeks ago."
The Messenger has reached out to reps for Swift and Kelce for comment.
In July, Kelce tried — and failed — to pass his phone number to Swift ahead of a stop on the singer's record-breaking Eras Tour.
During an episode of the New Heights podcast with his brother, Jason Kelce, the Kansas City Chiefs tight end said he made a bracelet for the show with the digits of his phone number on the beads.
The two-time Super Bowl champ wanted to gift the homemade jewelry to the pop star ahead of her Kansas City show at Arrowhead Stadium in July, but unfortunately for him, Swift didn't take the bait.
"I was disappointed that she doesn't talk before or after her shows because she has to save her voice for the 44 songs that she sings, so I was a little butthurt I didn't get to hand her one of the bracelets I made for her," Kelce explained on the podcast.
As his brother laughed, Kelce added, "She doesn't meet anybody — or at least she didn't want to meet me, so I took it personal, but it was an unbelievable show."
The pairing comes after Swift and Matty Healy's whirlwind romance came to an end in June after weeks of dating.
"It was a whirlwind romance but Taylor and Matty are now not together. Taylor broke it off with him, and it happened fast," a source told The Messenger at the time. "They had a lot of fun together, and it moved really quickly, but ultimately Taylor wanted to move on and be single."
Swift was linked to Healy in May after she and longtime boyfriend Joe Alwyn broke up in April. The 12-time Grammy winner is releasing 1989 (Taylor's Version) on Oct. 27.
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
Did I say it wasn't working?
Originally Posted by :
If he was someone else, he'd be in jail and going to jail for years.
The above statement seemed to imply that people are just letting it go with no consequences because of who he is.
By the way - I really don't think there are people sitting in jail for years for forcibly kissing someone. Could be wrong but just haven't heard of that one. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace: :-) Yes, you absolutely did.
That was not my intention. He is being held responsible by the law. And thats the final decider of his fate as it should be, not public opinion. But.....my point was we all have seen the video. Guilty as shit.
If you commit a crime and its on tape. It's public and clearly shows the crime. Your employer doesn't wait to the jury makes a decision, they will fire you. Or at a minimum ban you from work, No, he's not an employee but he has no business being there. That's just my opinion that no one cares about. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
That was not my intention. He is being held responsible by the law. And thats the final decider of his fate as it should be, not public opinion. But.....my point was we all have seen the video. Guilty as shit.
If you commit a crime and its on tape. It's public and clearly shows the crime. Your employer doesn't wait to the jury makes a decision, they will fire you. Or at a minimum ban you from work, No, he's not an employee but he has no business being there. That's just my opinion that no one cares about.
So you're thinking his mom should fire him from the family? Or the Chiefs should ban him from the stadium? What solution to the Jackson Mahomes problem are you proposing? Do you want the Chiefs to hire people to scan court records and ban everyone from the stadium that's facing criminal charges? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
So you're thinking his mom should fire him from the family? Or the Chiefs should ban him from the stadium? Do you want the Chiefs to hire people to scan court records and ban everyone from the stadium that's facing criminal charges?
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
Don't be ridiculous.:-)
Well you're bitching about the fact that he's in the stadium, what is the solution...? Send Burt to talk to Mahomes?
Hey Patrick.
Bruh.
We... we've been giving this a lot of thought, and we're, uh... we're gonna ban your brother from the stadium.
Just, man... I know he's your flesh and blood, but it's just a bad look.
We like you and all, but man... you have to see what these fat old men on the internet are saying. And these Swifties. They are writing tweets. We just can't have this.
Yes, we know a lot of NFL players grew up hard and have family that have done hard time.
Yeah, that's true. We've written some big checks to guys with checkered pasts who worked in that locker room. Mmmhmm.
Well, sorry. This one old dude posted this morning that he's had it and we've got no choice. I hope this doesn't hurt our relationship, cause we're cool.
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
What was he doing there? They have a point.
We all have seen the video. He is guilty as ****. This is not a case of innocent until proved guilty in a court of law situation. We have seen the evidence. This isn't about being "canceled". Or a both sides issue.
Even if you have a famous brother, your cant just grab women and force your tongue down their throat against their will. If he was someone else, he'd be in jail and going to jail for years.
He should not be in that stadium suite.
Agreed. Patrick Mahomes, Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce...The Kansas City Chiefs...these are are way too big of brands to be associating with Jackson publicly. In today's extreme cancel culture environment, it's bad PR. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
What solution to the Jackson Mahomes problem are you proposing?
For Jackson to be mature enough to understand his actions have direct effects on those around him, and part of those consequences is not being able to hang out with Taylor Swift in a Chiefs press box.
Obviously, no one can make him. No one is going to tell Patrick that his brother isn't welcome. It has to come from Jackson himself to understand that his actions have destroyed his reputation in the public eye, and any brand association with him is bad publicity for those people.
So if you care about those people, don't put them in that situation.
Oh is this another time BRC makes some blowhard point that everyone disagrees with and then later complains how everyone else is taking it too seriously and just kept arguing over something so stupid?
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
For Jackson to be mature enough to understand his actions have direct effects on those around him, and part of those consequences is not being able to hang out with Taylor Swift in a Chiefs press box.
Obviously, no one can make him. No one is going to tell Patrick that his brother isn't welcome. It has to come from Jackson himself to understand that his actions have destroyed his reputation in the public eye, and any brand association with him is bad publicity for those people.
So if you care about those people, don't put them in that situation.
Asking for a lot, i know.
Yep 100%. Taylor manages her image very carefully and I am pretty surprised she allowed herself to be around him. I will be surprised if it happens again. [Reply]
Haven't heard a peep about Jackson for a while now so maybe he's learned something at this point. I was at the game so I didn't see the shots of the booth with Taylor, Brit and company so I don't know that there is anything to complain about except Jacksons presence. Some of you holier than thou guys seem a little triggered. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dirk digler:
Yep 100%. Taylor manages her image very carefully and I am pretty surprised she allowed herself to be around him. I will be surprised if it happens again.
She just dated a guy that the Swifties hated because he made a joke about what kind of porn he watches. Ridiculous stuff if you ask me. [Reply]
Originally Posted by philfree:
Haven't heard a peep about Jackson for a while now so maybe he's learned something at this point. I was at the game so I didn't see the shots of the booth with Taylor, Brit and company so I don't know that there is anything to complain about except Jacksons presence. Some of you holier than thou guys seem a little triggered.
Yeah, I'm not sure what people can really expect. I'm not sure who is actually paying for the suite, but it's pretty clear that a lot of Patrick's friends and family are in there. In that sense, Taylor's a guest, and she doesn't get the power to dictate the guest list. [Reply]
