Chiefs Let’s talk about the Texans - Page 14

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
No, that's not what I said.

Of course there's risk. The question is how much. It's not up to me to prove, Im not the one making the assumption that he's gonna get hurt if he plays.

“A QB who has been sacked 19 times during the past six games and is now trying to play with a high ankle sprain/limited mobility… no risk/nothing to see here.”

If you say so.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88:
“A QB who has been sacked 19 times during the past six games and is now trying to play with a high ankle sprain/limited mobility… no risk/nothing to see here.”

If you say so.

I literally said there was risk.

I guess if you don't have any other evidence you can just resort to putting words in my mouth.

Hope that works out for you.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Tis, I respect your opinion, but I think you’re wrong on this one.

Last year sitting Week 18 against LA did wonders for Mahomes and he wasn’t even hurt at that time.

This Saturday isn’t week 18 with our seeding set.
[Reply]

I don’t know that our best chance to win 2 of the next 3 doesn’t involve sitting an injured Mahomes for this one game. I really don’t.

He played through the high ankle one time when it was do or die. This isn’t that.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Let's recap:

If Mahomes plays, our season is over because he's gonna get hurt.

But we can win with Wentz and beat Buffalo on the road two years in a row.

Chiefsplanet paradox, right here.

It makes one wonder why we are paying Mahomes so much money when we could be paying Wentz much less and still have the same success…
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Raiderhater:
It makes one wonder why we are paying Mahomes so much money when we could be paying Wentz much less and still have the same success…

Sitting Mahomes because you're scared of injury is like unplugging the Internet because you don't want to get hacked.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
I literally said there was risk.

I guess if you don't have any other evidence you can just resort to putting words in my mouth.

Hope that works out for you.

So there is a risk? Not just “irrational fear mongering”?

And when Mahomes played through this similar injury two years ago… he wasn’t playing behind a dumpster fire offensive line that had given up nearly 20 sacks during the past six games as has happened this year.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Raiderhater:
It makes one wonder why we are paying Mahomes so much money when we could be paying Wentz much less and still have the same success…

[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
2 opinions matter: Andy’s and Pat’s.

If he can play, he will.

We know this.

Pat's opinion SHOULDNT matter. I know it DOES but it shouldn't. Because he will want to play.

Protect him from himself.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88:
So there is a risk? Not just “irrational fear mongering”?

And when Mahomes played through this similar injury two years ago… he wasn’t playing behind a dumpster fire offensive line that had given up nearly 20 sacks during the past six games as has happened this year.

There can be a risk and irrational fear mongering.

There's a huge difference between possible and probable.

If the line is a dumpster fire going to get him hurt, then playing an extra game is a death sentence for the 3peat.

You can't have it both ways.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Look at FPI. Look at Vegas. Look at NFL history.

The odds are MUCH better playing 1 less game in the playoffs.

The #1 seed gives them by far the best chance to win the Super Bowl.

I'm aware of those odds. I'm also aware that our odds are 0% if Mahomes isn't healthy a month from now.

The choice is clear.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
I'm aware of those odds. I'm also aware that our odds are 0% if Mahomes isn't healthy a month from now.

The choice is clear.

Again, who says he's not healthy a month from now? You're jumping to conclusions.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
There can be a risk and irrational fear mongering.

There's a huge difference between possible and probably.

If the line is a dumpster fire going to get him hurt, then playing an extra game is a death sentence for the 3peat.

You can't have it both ways.

Not playing Mahomes and still beating the Texans to remain on track for the #1 seed.

Again, not mutually exclusive.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Again, who says he's not healthy a month from now? You're jumping to conclusions.

Better chance he's hurt in a month if you're throwing him out there while hobbled against Houston and Pittsburgh pass rushes when one bad tackle could snap his ankle in half.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88:
Not playing Mahomes and still beating the Texans to remain on track for the #1 seed.

Again, not mutually exclusive.

Winning with Wentz is anything but a foregone conclusion. There were literally people saying this thread that we could beat the Texans "comfortably" with Wentz.

They haven't beaten ANYBODY comfortably this year, with Mahomes.
[Reply]