Originally Posted by Megatron96:
No dog in this, but now I'm for Iowa just because the reffing has been so ridiculously biased.
It’s a little one sided. But they seem to be just terrible all around. Both teams are getting fouls on every possession. Lsu less impacted because they got a lot from their bench. [Reply]
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501:
It’s a little one sided. But they seem to be just terrible all around. Both teams are getting fouls on every possession. Lsu less impacted because they got a lot from their bench.
That technical on Clark for nothing was utter BS. [Reply]
Gonna be tough for Iowa now. They have three starters with four fouls. That’s going impact how they play defense which will affect how aggressive they can be. LSU should get a lot more easy shots. [Reply]
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief:
Yea, for FFS... The game started out 6 fouls to 0. how else do you explain it...
They started the game by forcing lsu to put their best players in the bench for the entire first half. A little one sided but the big difference is that lsu bench stepped up where Iowa is too dependent on their starters.
From that standpoint, the refs totally swayed the game. Which absolutely sucks for Iowa. But that seems way more about just absurdly whistle happy officials on both ends than it was one sidedness. Definitely felt tilted in LSUs favor but they were calling it real bad on both ends [Reply]