Originally Posted by KranzDictum:
kFc staff getting shaken up as much as the Broncos staff.
I wonder if this is the year Toub gets a gig too. That would be awesome to get him out of the AFC West. Smartest thing Andy ever did was to hire him.
Choked so bad dudes want to quit!
EPIC
Let us know when your epically bad staff starts getting any calls to be HC’s... or even lateral moves...Won’t be for quite a long time cuz your coaching staff is garbage! Yeah Toub was just so awesome this season right? Just like you numbskulls we’re pimping olivo when you “stole” him away last year!! [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Remember when the Broncos started the season off strong and Broncos fans thought they were going to be a playoff contender and Semen was the answer?
I couldn't hear you so well....our Super Bowl 50 win was talking too loud. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco:
Was it even called the Super Bowl then? Did they even have a ring back then? I know the Romans had just defeated the Gauls.
Number one WR talk is always fun... depends on the offense.
For as long as I can recall, the #1 WR (or #1 receiving threat) in KC has always been a TE. Gonzo and now Kelce. It's not a knock, it's just what it is.
Tyreek is an amazing talent... guys like him, the burners (for me) are better suited as the #2. Stretch the field, make amazing catches. Everyone wants to call him the next Antonio Brown and while I get the comparisons, he's not there yet. (not a knock)
I like #1 WRs to be the more traditional size of big WR - those should be guys that are getting the bulk of the targets and consistently producing. The #2 should be the change of pace guy that will break the spirit of the defense and as equal a threat as the TE. There's half a dozen or so amazing TEs, the rest are guys.
Tyreek is KC's defacto top (or #1) WR, but Kelce is the straw that stirs the drink and that's not bad thing, again - it is what it is. That's not to say he can't consistently produce like a top WR, he's done it so far. Hill ranked 29th in targets and 18th in receptions in 2017.
I think KC would do themselves well to sign or develop a traditional #1 receiver target and let Tyreek run wild as the true #2 receiver. Kelce is the top receiver target... and for good reason, but Hill would likely see bigger numbers with a different passing scheme with PM if they had a more consistent threat at WR opposite Hill that was more of the traditional WR mold.
Just my $.02 --- go get a WR with size and really watch that passing game take off. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcpasco:
Conley has size. I’d like to give him a full season with Mahomes. The Chiefs have much bigger issues than WR at the moment.
Sure they do, but I'm not suggesting they drop a boatload of money on another WR... they're out there. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Number one WR talk is always fun... depends on the offense.
For as long as I can recall, the #1 WR (or #1 receiving threat) in KC has always been a TE. Gonzo and now Kelce. It's not a knock, it's just what it is.
Tyreek is an amazing talent... guys like him, the burners (for me) are better suited as the #2. Stretch the field, make amazing catches. Everyone wants to call him the next Antonio Brown and while I get the comparisons, he's not there yet. (not a knock)
I like #1 WRs to be the more traditional size of big WR - those should be guys that are getting the bulk of the targets and consistently producing. The #2 should be the change of pace guy that will break the spirit of the defense and as equal a threat as the TE. There's half a dozen or so amazing TEs, the rest are guys.
Tyreek is KC's defacto top (or #1) WR, but Kelce is the straw that stirs the drink and that's not bad thing, again - it is what it is. That's not to say he can't consistently produce like a top WR, he's done it so far. Hill ranked 29th in targets and 18th in receptions in 2017.
I think KC would do themselves well to sign or develop a traditional #1 receiver target and let Tyreek run wild as the true #2 receiver. Kelce is the top receiver target... and for good reason, but Hill would likely see bigger numbers with a different passing scheme with PM if they had a more consistent threat at WR opposite Hill that was more of the traditional WR mold.
Just my $.02 --- go get a WR with size and really watch that passing game take off.
While I don't necessarily disagree, you mention Antonio Brown, then talk about "traditional size". Brown is listed at 5' 10" - do you consider him to be a true #1? [Reply]