ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 1323 of 2138
« First < 32382312231273131313191320132113221323 13241325132613271333137314231823 > Last »
Hall of Classics>The 10pm thread (archived)
crazycoffey 10:00 PM 01-05-2007
The big anti-hijack thread.....
Talk about anything, but if this works than we don't have to keep looking around all the threads to see who is still on tonight, and every night, or even every day! Talk about the chiefs, talk about tomorrow, talk about football, politics or even how to do flooring and the applicable budget. What you're drinking, how hard it is to sleep, etc. Every thing is acceptable in this thread.....

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldcloc...om.html?sort=2 see for yourself, it is ten o'clock somewhere.
luv 12:09 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Mr. Carlson the Bugeater:
Haha, I lied.
Thank goodness. You have a reputation to uphold, ya know.
Bugeater 12:12 AM 05-16-2007
If I had any ambition, I'd postwhore this thread to 20,000. But I don't, so I won't.
007 12:12 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by luv:
Thank goodness. You have a reputation to uphold, ya know.
:-) :-)
luv 12:13 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Mr. Carlson the Bugeater:
If I had any ambition, I'd postwhore this thread to 20,000. But I don't, so I won't.
Where's DenverChief when you need him?
Bugeater 12:14 AM 05-16-2007
And what exactly is "won't" a contraction for, Miss Spelling and Grammar Person? Wo not?
luv 12:15 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Mr. Carlson the Bugeater:
And what exactly is "won't" a contraction for, Miss Spelling and Grammar Person? Wo not?
Will not. I don't know where the 'o' came from.
Bugeater 12:16 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by luv:
Will not. I don't know where the 'o' came from.
Or, for that matter, where in the hell did the 'i' and the two 'l's go? I think someone was hittin' the bong when they came up with that.
luv 12:18 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Mr. Carlson the Bugeater:
Or, for that matter, where in the hell did the 'i' and the two 'l's go? I think someone was hittin' the bong when they came up with that.
ain't = aim not?
Bugeater 12:21 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by luv:
ain't = aim not?
It's supposed to be "are not", but it's not acceptable while "won't" is.
luv 12:23 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Mr. Carlson the Bugeater:
It's supposed to be "are not", but it's not acceptable while "won't" is.
I was thinking more along the lines of "I ain't going to" as opposed to "I'm not going to". Either way, it's not grammatically correct.
Bugeater 12:25 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by luv:
I was thinking more along the lines of "I ain't going to" as opposed to "I'm not going to". Either way, it's not grammatically correct.
Well I don't think that "won't" is either, so I will not continue to use it. That'll show 'em.
007 12:26 AM 05-16-2007
Chiefsplanet members debated proper english? Have we reached a new low?
Bugeater 12:27 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Guru:
Chiefsplanet members debated proper english? Have we reached a new low?
It's a slow night.
007 12:30 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Mr. Carlson the Bugeater:
It's a slow night.
I guess. :-)
luv 12:33 AM 05-16-2007
Originally Posted by Guru:
Chiefsplanet members debated proper english? Have we reached a new low?
You's gots a problem widdat?
Page 1323 of 2138
« First < 32382312231273131313191320132113221323 13241325132613271333137314231823 > Last »
Up