Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Why are you here?
Probably to REMIND YOU that he told you that you that the Last Place Denver Broncos would finish in last place, back in April. He tried to tell you during the year, but you were nowhere to be found because you bailed for WEEEEEEEEKS when it started happening. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
Probably to REMIND YOU that he told you that you guys would suck back in April. He tried to tell you during the year but you bailed for WEEEEEEEEKS when it started happening. :-)
He was saying stuff like that when Denver was winning the division every year and going to Super Bowls as well. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Dorsey will take the best offer, but if two deals are close I could see him siding with KC's rival if there's some bad blood between Dorsey and KC.
Dorsey isn't trading shit. He has to build his own roster and is in great shape to do so. A shit load of draft picks and tons of cash. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Flachief58:
Dorsey isn't trading shit. He has to build his own roster and is in great shape to do so. A shit load of draft picks and tons of cash.
If he uses some of that cash to sign Kirk Cousins he can get himself even more draft picks. Heck, he might be able to get Shaq Barrett along with those draft picks. [Reply]
Dorsey is not trading down in a shit draft class when he already has a shit ton of picks.
He will take the BPA at #1 and with Darnold sounding like he wouldn’t ask the Browns not to pick him, I’d assume it’s a lock it will be him if he comes out. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Dorsey is not trading down in a shit draft class when he already has a shit ton of picks.
He will take the BPA at #1 and with Darnold sounding like he wouldn’t ask the Browns not to pick him, I’d assume it’s a lock it will be him if he comes out.
If you like QB's, RB's, and offensive lineman this is pretty good draft. The draft is a little top heavy at other positions though. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
If you like QB's, RB's, and offensive lineman this is pretty good draft. The draft is a little top heavy at other positions though.
And if it's so top-heavy, why the hell would Cleveland want MORE picks at lower value? They have two 1sts in the top 10 already and a billion 2nds. Why the hell wouldn't they just use those picks on the draft's top-end value instead of fucking around with the shit in the middle and bottom?
They need TOP players. They need to stop losing. They DON'T need more bullshit draft picks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Exactly it’s “top heavy”, yet Dorsey is going to trade back for more picks when he already has 5 picks in the first 2 rounds?
Yes, because John Dorsey only cares about the needs of the Broncos. :-) [Reply]
And if it's so top-heavy, why the hell would Cleveland want MORE picks at lower value?
They need TOP players. They need to stop losing. They DON'T need more bullshit draft picks.
They would only be moving down four or five picks. Getting a first this year, a first next year, and Shaq Barrett for the #1 and a 2nd or 3rd rounder would be a good deal for them. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
They would only be moving down four or five picks. Getting a first this year, a first next year, and Shaq Barrett for the #1 and a 2nd or 3rd rounder would be a good deal for them.
No, it wouldn't be.
Do you think the Lions would have taken that trade in 2009 after going 0-16? Trading for a picks and a LB does nothing for the Browns. Nothing. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
They would only be moving down four or five picks. Getting a first this year, a first next year, and Shaq Barrett for the #1 and a 2nd or 3rd rounder would be a good deal for them.
I love how KnowMo continues to bring up Barrett’s name in trades like he’s this extremely valuable asset. Why the fuck do the Browns want Barrett when they have Garrett and Ogbah? [Reply]
