ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 1286 of 5278
« First < 28678611861236127612821283128412851286 128712881289129012961336138617862286 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>Broncos news megathread
ROYC75 04:26 PM 08-12-2014
Discussion: All things Broncos.
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 04:25 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
So what? He's an excellent ST's player and he plays behind two Pro Bowl WR's. It's not like Denver wasted a day 2 pick like KC did with Russell and Gaines.
:-) Facts!!?!?!?! So what?
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 05:50 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Albert Wilson (UDFA) >>>> Latimer
If Latimer were given the same amount of playing time you wouldn't be saying that.

DT and Sanders have missed 2 games combined in the 4 years Latimer has been in Denver. He really hasn't gotten a chance to play.
[Reply]
jjchieffan 05:56 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
If Latimer were given the same amount of playing time you wouldn't be saying that.

DT and Sanders have missed 2 games combined in the 4 years Latimer has been in Denver. He really hasn't gotten a chance to play.
If he was any good, he would have earned more playing time. It's not like Thomas and Sanders are the only ones that get targeted. Our "gadget player", as you call him came in and got more production as a 5th round rookie than Latimer has for his career.

And DT is dead. He doesn't get any catches. Certainly not for the cheating Donks. That POSS receiver for the Donk is unworthy of the nickname DT
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 06:02 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
If Latimer were given the same amount of playing time you wouldn't be saying that.

DT and Sanders have missed 2 games combined in the 4 years Latimer has been in Denver. He really hasn't gotten a chance to play.
Lattimer plays just under 50% of Broncos offensive snaps in 2017. 39 plays per game
Wilson plays 65% of Chiefs offensive snaps in 2017. 36 plays per game.

Is that really such a big difference?
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 06:09 PM 12-19-2017
For whatever reason DT and Sanders can't/won't/aren't comfortable playing in the slot and Latimer isn't either. That's why you've seen Bennie Fowler and Jordan Norwood playing in the slot the past few years.

Latimer started off slow with Manning and then got buried on the depth chart behind two Pro Bowl outside receivers.
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 06:15 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
For whatever reason DT and Sanders can't/won't/aren't comfortable playing in the slot and Latimer isn't either. That's why you've seen Bennie Fowler and Jordan Norwood playing in the slot the past few years.

Latimer started off slow with Manning and then got buried on the depth chart behind two Pro Bowl outside receivers.
Getting pepper sprayed at a strip club probably didn't help his situation much either.
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 06:15 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Lattimer plays just under 50% of Broncos offensive snaps in 2017. 39 plays per game
Wilson plays 65% of Chiefs offensive snaps in 2017. 36 plays per game.

Is that really such a big difference?
Latimer has gotten more playing time this year and he's putting up better numbers than Wilson is on a per catch basis.
[Reply]
jjchieffan 06:17 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
For whatever reason DT and Sanders can't/won't/aren't comfortable playing in the slot and Latimer isn't either. That's why you've seen Bennie Fowler and Jordan Norwood playing in the slot the past few years.

Latimer started off slow with Manning and then got buried on the depth chart behind two Pro Bowl outside receivers.
I don't know about Sanders, but of course a dead Chiefs linebacker is going to be uncomfortable in the slot.

Quit making excuses for him. If he was any good, he would have more production. Sanders could retire in the off-season and Latimer would still not produce next year.
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 06:20 PM 12-19-2017
Player A: 19 receptions for 287 yards and 2 touchdowns. 378 snaps played

Player B: 29 receptions for 371 yards and 3 touchdowns. 440 snaps played.

Which player is having the better year?
[Reply]
staylor26 06:22 PM 12-19-2017
If the problem simply is the guys in front of him are so good then why didn’t Latimer do anything while Sanders was out this year?
[Reply]
jjchieffan 06:37 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by staylor26:
If the problem simply is the guys in front of him are so good then why didn’t Latimer do anything while Sanders was out this year?
We all know the correct answer. It's because Latimer is a scrub. But I'm anxious to hear KnowShits lame excuse for this fact.
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 07:22 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by staylor26:
If the problem simply is the guys in front of him are so good then why didn’t Latimer do anything while Sanders was out this year?
Because Siemian was so busy throwing to the other team that he forgot to throw the ball to Cody.
[Reply]
CasselGotPeedOn 07:29 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Player A: 19 receptions for 287 yards and 2 touchdowns. 378 snaps played

Player B: 29 receptions for 371 yards and 3 touchdowns. 440 snaps played.

Which player is having the better year?
They seem like similar players. Hilarious that one is an UDFA and the other went in the 2nd round. :-)
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 07:46 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Yeah I get it, Hill's speed makes him a great decoy. He's a special little gadget guy who's a threat to take it 80+ yards on every play. He just can't get open unless he outruns one-on-one coverage.
No, you don't. Hill may not have ideal height, but he damned sure has everything else.
Pair him with a QB unafraid of the tightest windows, and Hill becomes one of the best and most productive in the league.
Overnight.
[Reply]
RealSNR 07:49 PM 12-19-2017
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
McCaffery isn't a gadget guy. He's a RB/slot receiver/returner. He has better hands and route running ability than Hill does.

I'm not saying Hill is a bad player. He's just not a number 1 WR. You completely neuter Hill by putting a safety over the top of him. Tyreek Hill is the last "#1 WR" I'd want to go to on 4th and 5 with the game on the line.
Would you go to him at the goal line with barely any time left on the clock on the road to tie against a bitter division rival?



Because obviously the Chiefs didn't get the memo. They're using him in clutch situations and he's coming up big.
[Reply]
Page 1286 of 5278
« First < 28678611861236127612821283128412851286 128712881289129012961336138617862286 > Last »
Up